Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2B Solution Architect Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B Solution Architect exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 9
[All B2B Solution Architect Questions]

Mask Makers LLC has a traditional sales channel that uses an existing CPQ implementation to process orders. Customers frequently reorder previous purchases quickly and split the order into several deliveries for different locations. Additionally, these customers are given special pricing through Price Books m CPQ based on annual spending and other parameters. The customer currently makes their purchase by sending an email or calling their appointed sales representative, and then waits to receive a quote.

Mask Makers LLC wants to move away from this very manual and time-consuming process. The company wants to provide its customers with a personalized experience that is simplified and streamlined with existing special pricing visible and the option to self-serve- Mask Makers LLC would also like to deliver this within a short timeframe, as business must continue to grow.

Which design approach should a Solution Architect recommend to meet these requirements within the timeframe while adhering to best practices.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

A Salesforce Center of Excellence (COE) is a centralized division within your company that oversees and manages all aspects of the Salesforce instance, including projects, maintenance, and support12.A COE acts as a central governing body for the entire organization and funnels all decision making and product ownership through a single group2.By creating a COE, you can ensure that all development decisions will be made by internal resourceswho have direct relationships with stakeholders throughout the company12.

Another benefit of creating a COE is that knowledge of the solution will stay within the organization3.A COE provides leadership, best practices, research, support and training for Salesforce3.By having an internal team that is responsible for implementing and maintaining the solution, you can avoid relying on external vendors or consultants who may not have your best interests at heart or who may leave after the project is done4.


Contribute your Thoughts:

An
1 months ago
Haha, Ashton's got a point. Building a custom integration just for the sake of it is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Option B is the way to go, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 months ago
Option D? Really? Who wants to build a custom integration when there's a perfectly good connector available? Sounds like a lot of unnecessary work to me.
upvoted 0 times
Harris
1 days ago
C) Implement B2B Commerce and use the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector to integrate to CPQ. Allow bidirectional updates to Products and Pricing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
4 days ago
B) Implement B2B Commerce and use the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector to integrate to CPQ. Keep CPQ as the Product and Pricing master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
8 days ago
A) Implement B2B Commerce and use the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector to integrate to CPQ. Set B2B Commerce as the Product and Pricing master.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latanya
1 months ago
As a solution architect, I'd recommend option B. It's the simplest way to meet the requirements while minimizing the impact on the existing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
1 months ago
I'm not sure I understand the difference between options B and C. Wouldn't bidirectional updates to Products and Pricing just overcomplicate things?
upvoted 0 times
Novella
5 days ago
Yes, bidirectional updates might add complexity. Option B might be simpler and easier to manage in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
17 days ago
Option B keeps CPQ as the master for Products and Pricing, while Option C allows bidirectional updates. It could be more complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
1 months ago
I agree with Barrett. Option B seems to be the most straightforward approach while still providing the desired customer experience.
upvoted 0 times
Theola
1 days ago
User 3: Agreed, it seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 days ago
User 2: Yeah, keeping CPQ as the Product and Pricing master makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
25 days ago
User 1: I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
2 months ago
Option B sounds like a good fit. Keeping CPQ as the Product and Pricing master makes sense since it's the existing system of record.
upvoted 0 times
Ronny
2 days ago
Yes, sticking with CPQ as the master for Product and Pricing data would ensure consistency and accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
5 days ago
I think it's important to leverage the existing system as much as possible to avoid any disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
11 days ago
It would definitely streamline the process for both the company and the customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
26 days ago
I agree, it would be easier to integrate B2B Commerce with CPQ if CPQ remains as the master for products and pricing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
27 days ago
Option B sounds like a good fit. Keeping CPQ as the Product and Pricing master makes sense since it's the existing system of record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
2 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
2 months ago
That's a valid point, Lavelle. But I still think option A is the quickest and most straightforward solution for Mask Makers LLC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice. Building a custom integration will give us more control over the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
3 months ago
I think we should go with option A. It seems like the most efficient way to integrate B2B Commerce with CPQ.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77