Salesforce Exam ARC-801 Topic 5 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam

Question #: 19
Topic #: 5

Universal Containers (UC) is in the process of identifying if Revenue Cloud will work for its business processes. UC has already implemented Sales Cloud, which includes complex steps and checklists that are orchestrated based on changes made to an Opportunity. Based on the current Sales Cloud implementation, UC has concerns about how Revenue Cloud will interact with its current customizations on the Opportunity object and if it will be difficult to customize the solution in the future.

Which design approach should a Solution Architect recommend tomitigate concerns about custom processes on any single object?

AUse an event-driven design to separate automations that could run asynchronously from the save cycle with a third-party tool like Heroku.

BMigrate automations from Process Builder to a single flow that is triggered by record updates, using only the 'After Save' context so that all operations can be organized in a single flow.

CLeave the orchestration of the automation to Process Builder, but invoke autolaunched flows from Process Builderso that the actual operations run in flows.

DMigrate automations from Process Builder to flows triggered by record updates, organizing operations in separate flows for the 'Before Save' and 'After Save' contexts.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

This will ensure that all orders are stored in a single, unified database, and will make it easier to track and manage orders across different channels. Additionally, Salesforce Order Objects have built-in features that make it easy to integrate with ERP systems, B2B Commerce, and Marketing Cloud, allowing UC to create the desired fluidity between its application landscape.

by Tamar at Jan 24, 2024, 08:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARC-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kathrine

1 months ago

Option C? Really? Invoking autolaunched flows from Process Builder? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Hard pass!

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

1 months ago

Option A with Heroku sounds like a cool idea, but it might be overkill for this use case. I'd stick to the native Salesforce options to keep things simple.

upvoted 0 times

Shayne

16 days ago

I think using a single flow triggered by record updates could help organize operations effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

20 days ago

I agree, sticking to native Salesforce options would be more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option B. Consolidating all the automations into a single flow triggered by record updates sounds like a neat way to keep everything organized and manageable.

upvoted 0 times

Jennie

22 days ago

Using an event-driven design with a third-party tool like Heroku could also be a good way to mitigate concerns about custom processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

27 days ago

I think Option D could also work well by separating operations into different flows for 'Before Save' and 'After Save'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

1 months ago

I agree, Option B seems like a good approach to keep things organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

2 months ago

I agree with Ashton. Separating the automations into 'Before Save' and 'After Save' flows will make the solution more modular and easier to maintain in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

Jolanda

3 days ago

D) Migrate automations from Process Builder to flows triggered by record updates, organizing operations in separate flows for the 'Before Save' and 'After Save' contexts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearly

4 days ago

I agree with Ashton. Separating the automations into 'Before Save' and 'After Save' flows will make the solution more modular and easier to maintain in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

12 days ago

D) Migrate automations from Process Builder to flows triggered by record updates, organizing operations in separate flows for the 'Before Save' and 'After Save' contexts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Layla

14 days ago

B) Migrate automations from Process Builder to a single flow that is triggered by record updates, using only the 'After Save' context so that all operations can be organized in a single flow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldo

22 days ago

A) Use an event-driven design to separate automations that could run asynchronously from the save cycle with a third-party tool like Heroku.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

27 days ago

B) Migrate automations from Process Builder to a single flow that is triggered by record updates, using only the 'After Save' context so that all operations can be organized in a single flow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hector

1 months ago

A) Use an event-driven design to separate automations that could run asynchronously from the save cycle with a third-party tool like Heroku.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

2 months ago

Option D seems like the best approach to separate the automation logic from the Opportunity object. This way, we can have better control and organization over the different operations that need to be executed before and after saving the record.

upvoted 0 times

...

Soledad

2 months ago

I'm not sure, I think option A might also work well to separate automations and avoid conflicts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

2 months ago

I agree with you, Rosenda. Option D seems to be the best choice to organize operations effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosenda

2 months ago

I think option D sounds like a good approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

3 months ago

Using an event-driven design with a third-party tool like Heroku will help us separate automations and avoid potential conflicts with our custom processes.

upvoted 0 times

...