Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ARC-801 Topic 5 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 5
[All ARC-801 Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) is in the process of identifying if Revenue Cloud will work for its business processes. UC has already implemented Sales Cloud, which includes complex steps and checklists that are orchestrated based on changes made to an Opportunity. Based on the current Sales Cloud implementation, UC has concerns about how Revenue Cloud will interact with its current customizations on the Opportunity object and if it will be difficult to customize the solution in the future.

Which design approach should a Solution Architect recommend tomitigate concerns about custom processes on any single object?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

This will ensure that all orders are stored in a single, unified database, and will make it easier to track and manage orders across different channels. Additionally, Salesforce Order Objects have built-in features that make it easy to integrate with ERP systems, B2B Commerce, and Marketing Cloud, allowing UC to create the desired fluidity between its application landscape.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leanna
4 days ago
I agree with Ashton. Separating the automations into 'Before Save' and 'After Save' flows will make the solution more modular and easier to maintain in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
10 days ago
Option D seems like the best approach to separate the automation logic from the Opportunity object. This way, we can have better control and organization over the different operations that need to be executed before and after saving the record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
13 days ago
I'm not sure, I think option A might also work well to separate automations and avoid conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
15 days ago
I agree with you, Rosenda. Option D seems to be the best choice to organize operations effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
19 days ago
I think option D sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
22 days ago
Using an event-driven design with a third-party tool like Heroku will help us separate automations and avoid potential conflicts with our custom processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
24 days ago
Why do you think option A is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
25 days ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
25 days ago
I think we should go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77