Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ANC-301 Topic 4 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-301 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 4
[All ANC-301 Questions]

Cloud Kicks has informed CRM Analytics developers that they have two scenarios with restricted row-level security.

The parameters being:

1. Non-CXOs and VPs working in EMEA can have access to EMEA records only.

2. CXOs and VPs should have access to all data irrespective of the region (APAC, EMEA, etc.).

Which sharing method works for this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

For Cloud Kicks' requirements regarding access to data based on roles and geographic regions, the most efficient and scalable approach is to implement row-level security using fields on the user record, like Department or Region. Here's the rationale for choosing this approach:

Scalability and Maintenance: By applying security rules based on user record fields, Cloud Kicks can manage access dynamically without needing to maintain multiple dashboards or datasets. This reduces administrative overhead and simplifies updates as roles or regional structures change.

Flexibility: Using a field on the user record to control access allows for easy expansion or modification of security policies as new regions or roles are added.

Simplicity: This method ensures a clear and straightforward security model that can be easily audited and understood by administrators and compliance teams.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Daren
5 days ago
Wow, these Cloud Kicks folks really know how to keep their developers on their toes! But I have to say, B is the way to go. Gotta love that row-level security, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
9 days ago
You know, I was just thinking about how cloud computing has really kicked the analytics world into high gear. That's why I think B is the way to go here - it's the most flexible and scalable option.
upvoted 0 times
Stanton
2 days ago
User 1: I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alecia
14 days ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I bet the developers at Cloud Kicks are having a field day with all these requirements. Anyway, I agree with B - it's the most elegant solution in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Hildegarde
3 days ago
A) Create two sets of dashboards; one for EMEA, and one for CXOs and VPs while filtering the dashboard on the region.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawna
15 days ago
I prefer option A) creating separate dashboards for EMEA and CXOs, it seems more organized to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
17 days ago
I agree with Oliva, option B) seems like the most efficient way to handle the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Creating two separate datasets feels like overkill, and filtering the dashboard on the region might get messy. I'd go with B as well.
upvoted 0 times
Michal
14 days ago
A) Create two sets of dashboards; one for EMEA, and one for CXOs and VPs while filtering the dashboard on the region.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oliva
1 months ago
I think option B) makes sense, using a field on the user record for row-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 months ago
I think the answer is B. Using a field on the user record like Department/Region and applying row-level security based on that field seems like the most straightforward solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
7 days ago
Agreed. It's a simple and effective way to control access to different regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
15 days ago
That makes sense. It would be easier to manage access based on a specific field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
30 days ago
B) Use a field on the user record like Department/Region, and apply row-level security based on that field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77