Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ANC-301 Topic 10 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-301 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 10
[All ANC-301 Questions]

Universal Containers is evaluating the connection mode for the objects in their local Salesforce connector. They want to only sync updated and new records from the Order object, but they have some formula fields on the object and want to ensure those are updated weekly.

which

Which connection mode is best suited for this purpose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Wilbert
10 months ago
I'm going with B) Full Sync. Sure, it might be overkill, but at least I won't have to worry about missing anything. What's the worst that could happen, right? Oh, wait, my wallet just got a little lighter. Oops.
upvoted 0 times
Candida
10 months ago
Yeah, but what about the formula fields? I'm sticking with B) Full Sync to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
10 months ago
I think A) Periodic Incremental Sync would be better. It updates only the new and changed records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
11 months ago
Incremental Sync all the way! Why do more work than necessary? This is the perfect use case for it. Periodic Full Sync? What is this, the Stone Age?
upvoted 0 times
...
James
11 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with C) Periodic Full Sync. That way, the formula fields will be updated regularly, and the incremental sync will handle the new and updated records. Gotta cover all the bases, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
10 months ago
Definitely, it's important to have a sync mode that covers both the formula fields and the new/updated records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
10 months ago
Definitely, covering all bases with that choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
10 months ago
Yeah, that way they can ensure the formula fields are updated weekly and still sync new and updated records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
10 months ago
Yeah, it seems like the most comprehensive choice to make sure everything stays up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
I agree, C) Periodic Full Sync sounds like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
11 months ago
I agree, C) Periodic Full Sync sounds like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronald
11 months ago
I think D) Incremental Sync is the best option here. It will only sync the updated and new records, while the formula fields can be updated weekly using a scheduled job.
upvoted 0 times
Mila
10 months ago
Exactly, it's the best fit for their requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
That makes sense, so D) Incremental Sync is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
11 months ago
Those can be updated weekly using a scheduled job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
11 months ago
I think we can use a scheduled job to update the formula fields weekly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
11 months ago
But what about the formula fields on the object?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
11 months ago
Agreed, it will only sync the updated and new records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
11 months ago
I think D) Incremental Sync is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77