Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam ADX-201 Topic 9 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-201 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 9
[All ADX-201 Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters has a new flow that automatically sets the field values when a new

account is created. That the flow is launched by a process, But the flow is not working properly.

What should administrator do to identify the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To use as an identifier when importing and updating records from a separate system, an administrator should use External ID field type on an object. External ID fields allow storing unique identifiers from external systems and using them for matching records during import or update operations. External ID fields can also be used for upsert operations that insert new records or update existing ones based on external ID values. For example, an administrator can create an External ID field on Account object that stores account numbers from an external ERP system and use it for importing or updating accounts from that system. Rich Text field, Record ID, and Auto-Number field are not suitable for using as identifiers when importing and updating records from a separate system. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.fields_about_field_types.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.data_loader_upsert.htm&type=5


by Casie at Oct 22, 2023, 12:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ADX-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shalon
2 hours ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice. The native debug feature in the flow builder should give us a clear picture of what's happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 days ago
I'm leaning towards option C. The setup audit trail might hold the key to identifying the problem. It's worth a look.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
12 days ago
I think option B is the way to go. Reviewing the debug logs with the login level should provide valuable insights into what's going on with the flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
19 days ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should also review debug logs with the login level just to be thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
22 days ago
I agree with Kenneth, that seems like the best option to identify the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
24 days ago
I think we should use the native debug feature in the flow builder.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77