Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

RSA Exam 050-11-CARSANWLN01 Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for RSA's 050-11-CARSANWLN01 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 3
[All 050-11-CARSANWLN01 Questions]

Logging in to NetWitness via RAM requires which of the following to succeed'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glory
1 months ago
Logging in to NetWitness via RAM? Sounds like a job for the Kerberos crew, option D for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Ashanti
8 days ago
Definitely, option D is the right choice for NetWitness login via RAM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
13 days ago
I agree, Kerberos Authentication is the key to logging in via RAM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
16 days ago
I think option D, Kerberos Authentication, is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christoper
1 months ago
Don't worry, guys, I got this. It's all about that PAM user auth and group mapping, C all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Niesha
8 days ago
Great, let's go with C then. Thanks for the confirmation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
23 days ago
I agree, C is the way to go for logging in via RAM on NetWitness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 months ago
I think it's PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping, C sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alethea
2 months ago
C, definitely C. Layering authentication is the way to go, like putting sprinkles on top of your ice cream.
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
3 days ago
Kerberos Authentication is also a good option for secure access to NetWitness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
4 days ago
I agree, having both PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping adds an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
14 days ago
C, definitely C. Layering authentication is the way to go, like putting sprinkles on top of your ice cream.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmer
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm going with B, NSS Group Authentication. Keeps things nice and exclusive, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
2 days ago
I'm going to go with A, PAM User Authentication. It seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
3 days ago
I'm sticking with B, NSS Group Authentication. It just makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
6 days ago
I'm pretty sure it's D, Kerberos Authentication. That's the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 months ago
I think it's actually C, PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Kerberos Authentication could also be a valid option for logging in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 months ago
I agree with Noah, because both user authentication and group mapping are needed for access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
2 months ago
D, Kerberos Authentication. Easy peasy, just like logging into my favorite video game server.
upvoted 0 times
Delfina
1 months ago
I always go with option D too. It's the most secure method for logging in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 months ago
D, Kerberos Authentication. Easy peasy, just like logging into my favorite video game server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
2 months ago
Hmm, I think it's C - PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping. Gotta love those authentication layers!
upvoted 0 times
Dean
1 months ago
Yeah, better safe than sorry. C - PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 months ago
I always go with the extra layer of security, so C it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
1 months ago
I think D - Kerberos Authentication might also work, but C seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 months ago
I agree, C - PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noah
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) PAM User Authentication and Group Mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77