Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Qlik Exam QV12SA Topic 3 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Qlik's QV12SA exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 3
[All QV12SA Questions]

There is a QlikView document with separate "City" and "State" fields A system administrator needs to create separate QVW documents each with a singular "City and State" field.

Which method should the system administrator use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacki
1 months ago
I'm just picturing the system administrator trying to figure out how to spell 'concatenate' during the exam. That's the real challenge here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 months ago
I'm going to have to go with option B. Looping and reducing by 'City and State' just sounds like the most efficient way to handle this. Plus, it's got a nice ring to it, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Jeffrey
6 days ago
I would go with option D, it includes creating a bookmark for 'City and State'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
14 days ago
I think option C could work too, by concatenating 'City' and 'State' first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
16 days ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marshall
2 months ago
Option D with the bookmark seems a bit overkill. I don't think we need to create a bookmark for this task. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
14 days ago
Yeah, creating a bookmark for this task does seem unnecessary. Concatenating 'City' and 'State' then looping and reducing by 'City and State' should work just fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
15 days ago
I think concatenating 'City' and 'State' first before looping and reducing by 'City and State' is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient method for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristina
2 months ago
I'm not sure why we need to loop and reduce at all. Couldn't we just concatenate the 'City' and 'State' fields and be done with it? That would give us the singular 'City and State' field we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
24 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
1 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dortha
2 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward. Concatenating the 'City' and 'State' fields and then looping and reducing by the combined 'City and State' field is a logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
2 months ago
Why do you think option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the best method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
2 months ago
I think the system administrator should use option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77