There is a QlikView document with separate "City" and "State" fields A system administrator needs to create separate QVW documents each with a singular "City and State" field.
I'm going to have to go with option B. Looping and reducing by 'City and State' just sounds like the most efficient way to handle this. Plus, it's got a nice ring to it, don't you think?
Yeah, creating a bookmark for this task does seem unnecessary. Concatenating 'City' and 'State' then looping and reducing by 'City and State' should work just fine.
I'm not sure why we need to loop and reduce at all. Couldn't we just concatenate the 'City' and 'State' fields and be done with it? That would give us the singular 'City and State' field we're looking for.
Option C seems the most straightforward. Concatenating the 'City' and 'State' fields and then looping and reducing by the combined 'City and State' field is a logical approach.
Jacki
1 months agoAntonio
1 months agoJeffrey
6 days agoVirgina
14 days agoJolene
16 days agoMarshall
2 months agoSheron
14 days agoWalton
15 days agoLeslie
1 months agoCristina
2 months agoAlyce
24 days agoMacy
1 months agoDortha
2 months agoHannah
2 months agoGertude
2 months agoHannah
2 months ago