Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Qlik Exam QSDA2024 Topic 2 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Qlik's QSDA2024 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 2
[All QSDA2024 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A data architect needs to build a dashboard that displays the aggregated sates for each sales representative. All aggregations on the data must be performed in the script.

Which script should the data architect use to meet these requirements?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The goal is to display the aggregated sales for each sales representative, with all aggregations being performed in the script. Option C is the correct choice because it performs the aggregation correctly using a Group by clause, ensuring that the sum of sales for each employee is calculated within the script.

Data Load:

The Data table is loaded first from the Sales table. This includes the OrderID, OrderDate, CustomerID, EmployeeID, and Sales.

Next, the Emp table is loaded containing EmployeeID and EmployeeName.

Joining Data:

A Left Join is performed between the Data table and the Emp table on EmployeeID, enriching the data with EmployeeName.

Aggregation:

The Summary table is created by loading the EmployeeName and calculating the total sales using the sum([Sales]) function.

The Resident keyword indicates that the data is pulled from the existing tables in memory, specifically the Data table.

The Group by clause ensures that the aggregation is performed correctly for each EmployeeName, summarizing the total sales for each employee.

Key Qlik Sense Data Architect Reference:

Resident Load: This is a method to reuse data that is already loaded into the app's memory. By using a Resident load, you can create new tables or perform calculations like aggregation on the existing data.

Group by Clause: The Group by clause is essential when performing aggregations in the script. It groups the data by specified fields and performs the desired aggregation function (e.g., sum, count).

Left Join: Used to combine data from two tables. In this case, Left Join is used to enrich the sales data with employee names, ensuring that the sales data is associated correctly with the respective employee.

Conclusion: Option C is the most appropriate script for this task because it correctly performs the necessary joins and aggregations in the script. This ensures that the dashboard will display the correct aggregated sales per employee, meeting the data architect's requirements.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gwenn
8 days ago
I don't know, man. This question is making my head spin. Maybe we should just flip a coin and hope for the best. At least that way, we can blame it on lady luck if we get it wrong.
upvoted 0 times
Shala
2 days ago
Let's not leave it up to chance. We should carefully analyze each script before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scarlet
17 days ago
Hold up, guys. Isn't Option C just, like, a blank canvas? I mean, how are we supposed to do any kind of aggregation with that? It's like asking a painter to paint a masterpiece with an empty canvas.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
3 days ago
Yeah, Option C looks like it's missing the necessary script for aggregations. We should go with one of the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
8 days ago
I agree, Option C doesn't seem to have any script for aggregation. It's definitely not the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
22 days ago
Option D is the obvious choice here. Look at that GROUP BY clause! It's got everything we need to get those sales aggregations. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
2 days ago
Definitely, Option D's script with the GROUP BY clause is the way to go for building the dashboard with aggregated sales data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
5 days ago
Yeah, Option D seems to have all the necessary components for aggregating sales data by sales representative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
15 days ago
I agree, Option D with that GROUP BY clause looks like the best choice for aggregating sales data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
1 months ago
Option C provides a more efficient way to aggregate sales data for each representative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 months ago
Why do you think Option C is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the best choice for the dashboard script.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A looks like it's doing the aggregation in the script, but I'm not sure if it meets all the requirements. I might have to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
Billy
7 days ago
User 3: Let's go with Option A then. It looks like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
14 days ago
User 2: I agree, Option A seems to be the most suitable for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
22 days ago
User 3: Let's go with Option A then. It looks like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
23 days ago
User 2: I agree, Option A seems to be the most suitable for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
24 days ago
User 1: I think Option A is the best choice. It looks like it's aggregating the data in the script.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
1 months ago
User 1: I think Option A is the best choice. It looks like it's aggregating the data in the script.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
2 months ago
I think the data architect should use Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. The question clearly states that all aggregations must be performed in the script, and Option B seems to be the only one that does that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77