Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Qlik Exam QREP Topic 4 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Qlik's QREP exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 4
[All QREP Questions]

Two companies are merging Both companies have IBM DB2 LUW running The Qhk Replicate administrator must merge a database (12 TB of data) into an existing database (15 TB of data). The merge will be done by IBM load.

Which approach should the administrator use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When merging databases, especially of such large sizes (12 TB and 15 TB), it is crucial to ensure data integrity and consistency. The recommended approach is to:

Stop the Replication Task: This is important to prevent any changes from being replicated to the target while the IBM load process is ongoing.

Perform the IBM Load: Execute the IBM load to merge the database into the existing database.

Resume the Replication Task: Once the IBM load has been successfully completed, the replication task can be resumed.

This approach ensures that the data loaded via IBM load is not missed or duplicated in the target database. It also allows Qlik Replicate to continue capturing changes from the point where the task was stopped, thus maintaining the continuity of the replication process.

It's important to note that creating a new task after the IBM load (Option D) could lead to complexities in managing the data consistency and might require additional configuration. Continuing to run the task (Option C) could result in conflicts or data integrity issues during the load process. Therefore, Option B is the safest and most reliable approach to ensure a smooth merge of the databases.

For further details and best practices, you can refer to the official Qlik Replicate documentation and support articles which provide guidance on similar scenarios1234.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Option B is the way to go. Gotta make sure those databases are in sync before moving forward. Don't want any surprises down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
5 days ago
Haha, I'd love to see someone try Option A and stop the task in the middle of the IBM load. That's a surefire way to end up with a big mess!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
8 days ago
Option C is risky. Continuing to run the task while the IBM load is in progress could lead to issues. Better to pause and resume once the load is done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
24 days ago
I'd go with Option D. Creating a new task after the IBM load is complete seems like a safer way to handle the merge.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
23 hours ago
Yeah, it's better to be cautious and create a new task after the IBM load is done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
4 days ago
I agree, starting a new task after the load finishes seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
8 days ago
I think Option D is the best choice. It's safer to create a new task after the IBM load.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherrell
28 days ago
Option B seems like the best approach. Waiting until the IBM load finishes and then resuming the task would ensure the merge is done properly.
upvoted 0 times
Viola
2 days ago
User 4: Let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
4 days ago
User 3: It's better to be patient and ensure the merge is done properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
13 days ago
User 2: I agree, waiting for the IBM load to finish is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
15 days ago
User 1: Option B seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonida
1 months ago
Because stopping the task and waiting for IBM load to finish ensures data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 months ago
Why do you think option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 months ago
I think the administrator should use option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77