Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 7 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 7
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer map application is built with a containerized micro-service infrastructure that runs on Windows and accesses storage using SMB.

Each container is stateless, but every end user interaction leaves a set of small text and image files. Each directory keeps all daily transaction files. A process exists to manage file life cycle and periodically delete a directory.

The customer notices that as the customer base grows, the background deletion process backlog also grows. Which FlashBlade technology should be used to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Blondell
1 months ago
Reducing resource utilization for the FlashBlade garbage collection sounds like a good idea, but the fast-remove option is probably the most straightforward way to tackle this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Geraldo
6 days ago
Agreed, it seems like the most straightforward way to handle the growing backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
17 days ago
I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB would be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
1 months ago
As a tech-savvy customer, I'd be impressed if the vendor could offer a solution that just makes the file deletion 'disappear' - pun intended!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
1 months ago
I'm curious to know how the fast-remove feature works. Does it somehow optimize the deletion process to handle the increasing number of files?
upvoted 0 times
Brandon
15 days ago
B: That sounds like it could really help with the backlog issue the customer is facing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
18 days ago
A: Fast-remove for NFS and SMB allows for quick deletion of files, optimizing the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
1 months ago
Concurrent data access might be overkill for this use case. What we really need is a way to speed up the deletion process, and the fast-remove feature seems to fit the bill.
upvoted 0 times
Yuette
15 days ago
I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB is the best option to resolve the backlog issue with the deletion process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
25 days ago
Concurrent data access might not be necessary in this case, fast-remove for NFS and SMB sounds like the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
1 months ago
I agree, enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB should help speed up the deletion process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
2 months ago
The fast-remove option for NFS and SMB sounds like the perfect solution to address the growing backlog issue. Deleting directories efficiently is key here.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
29 days ago
D: Enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB will definitely improve the performance of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 months ago
C: It's important to efficiently handle the deletion process as the customer base grows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 months ago
B: Agreed, that should help manage the growing backlog of files to delete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
1 months ago
B: Agreed, that should help manage the growing backlog of files to delete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 months ago
A: I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
2 months ago
A: I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think D) Reducing resource utilization for FlashBlade garbage collection could also be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
I agree with Vernice. Enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB would help resolve the backlog issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77