Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer wants to use FlashBlade as storage for a business critical, high-traffic SQL server. Why will this architecture fail?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dottie
1 months ago
The customer must be living in the 'Flash'back era if they think a FlashBlade can handle their SQL server like a blade of grass.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
8 days ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
13 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janae
1 months ago
Option D made me chuckle. While the customer's knowledge is important, the technical limitations of the architecture are the real issue here.
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
2 days ago
C) The FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
15 days ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
18 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawna
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if Option C is accurate. FlashBlade can scale pretty large, but the performance may still not be sufficient for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
4 days ago
C) The FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
14 days ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
25 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
I agree, the latency of NAS could definitely cause issues for a high-traffic SQL server. Option B is also a valid concern.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsay
23 days ago
C) The FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
24 days ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
25 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Howard
2 months ago
Option A seems to be the correct answer. FlashBlade is not designed to be a shared storage solution for a mission-critical SQL server.
upvoted 0 times
Major
23 days ago
D) The customer will NOT have the knowledge to run a SQL server on NAS. Lmao
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
1 months ago
C) The FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
1 months ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yong
2 months ago
I believe the FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB, causing the architecture to fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 months ago
I agree with Rolf, the inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 months ago
I think the architecture will fail because the FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77