Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pure Storage Exam FAAA_004 Topic 2 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FAAA_004 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 2
[All FAAA_004 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer is experiencing latency in the VMware environment connected to this array. What should the SE recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The exhibit shows latency in the VMware environment connected to the FlashArray. When troubleshooting latency issues in a VMware environment, the first step is to identify whether the issue originates from the storage array, the network, or the ESXi host. In this case, the SE should recommend checking the ESXi host , as it is often the source of latency problems in VMware environments.

Why This Matters:

ESXi Host Issues:

The ESXi host could be experiencing resource contention (e.g., CPU, memory, or network bottlenecks) or misconfigurations (e.g., improper queue depth settings or multipathing policies).

High latency on the ESXi host can impact the performance of virtual machines and appear as storage latency, even if the FlashArray itself is functioning optimally.

Why Not the Other Options?

A . Add DirectFlash Modules as the system is disk bound:

Pure Storage FlashArray uses DirectFlash Modules, which are NVMe-based and provide extremely low latency. If the array were disk-bound, it would indicate a hardware limitation, but this is unlikely with FlashArray's architecture. The issue is more likely related to the ESXi host or network.

B . Upgrade the controllers:

Controller upgrades are typically unnecessary unless the array is nearing its performance limits. Since the exhibit does not indicate any signs of controller saturation, this is not the correct recommendation.

C . Add network cards to alleviate network congestion:

While network congestion can cause latency, the issue is more likely related to the ESXi host configuration. Adding network cards should only be considered after confirming network bottlenecks through diagnostics.

Key Points:

ESXi Host Diagnostics: Start by checking the ESXi host for resource contention, misconfigurations, or improper settings.

Storage Array Health: Verify that the FlashArray is not experiencing any performance issues (e.g., high queue depths or latency).

Network Analysis: Only after ruling out the ESXi host and storage array should network-related issues be investigated.


Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: 'Troubleshooting Latency in VMware Environments'

VMware Best Practices Guide: 'Optimizing ESXi Host Performance'

Pure Storage Knowledge Base: 'Diagnosing and Resolving Latency Issues'

Contribute your Thoughts:

Izetta
2 days ago
Checking the ESXi host is also important to see if there are any issues there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
3 days ago
D. Check the ESXi host seems like the obvious choice here. You can't just throw more hardware at the problem without understanding the root cause first. Gotta be a detective, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
9 days ago
I believe adding DirectFlash Modules could also improve the performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 days ago
Whoa, hold on! What if the customer is just trying to play some crazy virtual reality game? Upgrading the controllers might be overkill. Let's just recommend adding more RAM and a better graphics card!
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
14 days ago
I agree with Stephane, upgrading the controllers could help with the latency issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 months ago
I think the answer is B. Upgrading the controllers should help improve the performance and reduce the latency in the VMware environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
1 months ago
I think the SE should recommend upgrading the controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77