Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA Exam 8007 Topic 3 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8007 exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 3

[All 8007 Questions]

Your stockbroker randomly recommends stocks to his clients from a tip sheet he is given each day. Today, his tip sheet has 3 common stocks and 5 preferred stocks from Asian companies and 3 common stocks and 5 preferred stocks from European companies. What is the probability that he will recommend a common stock AND/OR a European stock to you when you call and ask for one stock to buy today?

A11/16

B7/8

C9/16

DNone of these

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Cornell at Sep 14, 2024, 08:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 8007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Grover

6 months ago

Autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity... Sounds like a bunch of fancy stats jargon to me. I just want to know which answer will get me the most points on the test!

upvoted 0 times

Laquanda

6 months ago

D) Using an inappropriate functional form in the model

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

6 months ago

C) The omission of a relevant explanatory variable

upvoted 0 times

...

Rochell

6 months ago

B) A high positive correlation between two explanatory variables

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Frederic

6 months ago

I'm going with A. A structural break in the dependent variable is unlikely to be a direct cause of these statistical problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe C? Omitting a relevant variable could cause all sorts of problems.

upvoted 0 times

Gerardo

5 months ago

User 3: I'm not so sure, I think it might be D. Using an inappropriate functional form could also lead to problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Han

5 months ago

User 2: I agree, that seems like a plausible explanation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abraham

6 months ago

User 1: I think it could be C, omitting a relevant variable sounds like it could cause issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Edelmira

7 months ago

Hmm, that's a good point. It could definitely lead to autocorrelation or heteroskedasticity in the residuals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

7 months ago

I disagree, I believe it is D) Using an inappropriate functional form in the model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

7 months ago

D seems like the correct answer to me. Using an inappropriate functional form can definitely lead to these issues.

upvoted 0 times

Loreen

6 months ago

Agreed, it's important to choose the right functional form in regression models.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beth

6 months ago

Yeah, using an inappropriate functional form can cause problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

6 months ago

I think D is the correct answer too.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Edelmira

7 months ago

I think the answer is B) A high positive correlation between two explanatory variables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

7 months ago

I think the answer is B. A high positive correlation between two explanatory variables doesn't cause autocorrelation or heteroskedasticity.

upvoted 0 times

Royal

6 months ago

You're welcome!

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquita

6 months ago

Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvonne

7 months ago

No, it's actually D. Using an inappropriate functional form can cause those issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

7 months ago

I think the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77