PRINCE2 Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner exam

Question #: 67
Topic #: 3

At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.

Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?

AYes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.

BYes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.

CNo, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list.

DNo, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Twana at Jul 03, 2024, 04:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bobbye

1 months ago

Ah, the old 'I'm the developer, the reviewer, and the conductor' trick. Gotta love these project shenanigans!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

1 months ago

Aha, the senior supplier reviewing their own work? Someone's trying to pull a fast one on us here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernice

1 months ago

Hold up, a question list? That's like using a magic 8-ball to find errors. Might as well just guess the answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

2 months ago

Documenting possible errors in the quality register sounds like a great way to keep track of issues. Efficiency at its finest!

upvoted 0 times

Emerson

4 days ago

Documenting possible errors in the quality register helps ensure nothing gets missed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

5 days ago

B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulina

14 days ago

Documenting possible errors in the quality register helps ensure nothing is missed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olen

17 days ago

A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

20 days ago

B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edward

23 days ago

A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

2 months ago

Wait, the consultant is both the developer and the reviewer? Isn't that a conflict of interest or something?

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

2 months ago

I'm not sure about option D. Should the senior supplier really be involved in the quality review process?

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

2 months ago

I agree with Stevie. It's important to keep the quality register updated during quality review activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

2 months ago

I think option B is correct. Quality reviewers should update the quality register.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

2 months ago

But shouldn't the quality reviewers be the ones updating the quality register?

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

2 months ago

I agree with Genevieve, it helps track the progress of quality review activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Genevieve

2 months ago

I think it's important to document possible errors in the quality register.

upvoted 0 times

...