Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRINCE2 Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 2
[All PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions]

ABC has experience of delivering training projects that respond to new legislation. Previous projects have had to change the acceptance criteria, due to further updates being made to legislation during the project.

What action should be taken to address this, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Iluminada
1 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Changing the acceptance criteria is a given, so we might as well plan for it from the start.
upvoted 0 times
Wenona
6 days ago
Agree, setting quality tolerances in product descriptions allows for flexibility with changes in legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
8 days ago
Yes, that way we can easily make amendments through change control if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
9 days ago
I agree, it's important to prioritize acceptance criteria from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
1 months ago
Ha! Imagine if they'd gone with option C. Setting 'quality tolerances' for legislation? That's a new one! I'll stick with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 months ago
Hmm, option D seems the most logical. Quality tolerances will let us account for any legislative changes, so the project can still be closed successfully.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
9 days ago
User 3: That makes sense, it's important to have flexibility in the acceptance criteria for training projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
16 days ago
User 2: Yes, setting quality tolerances in the product descriptions will help us adapt to any updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
17 days ago
User 1: I agree, option D seems like the best choice to handle changes in legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Burma
2 months ago
I'll go with option B. Agreed acceptance criteria can always be updated through change control, so it's the most flexible choice.
upvoted 0 times
Ramonita
19 days ago
User 3: Yes, it's important to prioritize flexibility in case of changes to legislation during the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, having the ability to amend the acceptance criteria if needed is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
1 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice. It allows for flexibility through change control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
2 months ago
But what if there are further updates to legislation? Shouldn't we set quality tolerances in the product descriptions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
2 months ago
I agree with Mindy. It will help us determine if the project can be closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
3 months ago
I think we should prioritize the acceptance criteria during the initiation stage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77