Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-RMP Topic 9 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 9
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

When processing freight invoices for a project, the project manager notices the shipping costs exceeded the budget due to increased fuel costs. The risk manager included this risk in the project's contingency allowance. When reviewing the project budget execution reports, the project manager notices unused budget remaining in other closed tasks of the project that could cover the additional shipping costs.

What should the project manager do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erick
2 months ago
The correct answer is obviously A. Using the contingency fund is the most straightforward and responsible way to handle this. It's like my grandpa used to say, 'When the fuel costs rise, you gotta dip into the contingency pie!'
upvoted 0 times
Javier
27 days ago
User 2: Agreed, it's there for situations like this. Let's process the freight invoices with the higher shipping costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A and use the contingency allowance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to use the contingency fund for unexpected expenses like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should process the freight invoices at higher shipping costs against the project's contingency allowance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brendan
2 months ago
I like the idea of getting the project sponsor to cover the additional costs, but option D feels a bit like passing the buck. We should take ownership of this issue and use the contingency fund.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
2 months ago
I'm a bit skeptical about option B. Asking the customer for a change order just feels like it could create unnecessary tension and conflict. Let's try to avoid that if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
2 months ago
I disagree. I believe the project manager should request a formal change order from the customer to increase the project's total budget. It's better to be transparent about the increased costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
2 months ago
Option A seems like the straightforward choice here. The risk manager already factored in the increased shipping costs, so we should use the contingency allowance as intended.
upvoted 0 times
Brett
20 days ago
User 4: Agreed, let's not risk going over budget. Processing the invoices with the contingency allowance is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
23 days ago
User 3: Sounds good, let's make sure we stay within budget by using the contingency allowance as intended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's there for a reason. Let's process the freight invoices at the higher shipping costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, we should stick to the plan and use the contingency allowance for the increased shipping costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
2 months ago
I agree with Melita. It's important to use the contingency allowance for unexpected costs like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
3 months ago
I think the project manager should process the freight invoices at higher shipping costs against the project's contingency allowance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77