Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-RMP Topic 9 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 9
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

A company has a project whose objective is to extract gold reserves from Field 1. However, another field closest to the company. Field 2, which has a higher probability of having twice as much gold reserves than Field 1. The risk manager requests the board of Directors to include Field 2 under the scope of the current project by management of change because the project's profitability will increase by 80%.

What type of request is the risk manager describing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ezekiel
1 months ago
If this was a real exam, I'd give you a hard time for trying to smuggle in a gold pun. Nice try, but let's keep it professional, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Kate
12 days ago
The risk manager is trying to increase project earnings by including Field 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure this is a challenge to the project investment. The risk manager is clearly proposing a change to the project scope, so I'd say option C is the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
Shannan
5 days ago
True, it could affect project earnings as well. But the main focus seems to be on changing the scope, so I still lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
6 days ago
But wouldn't including Field 2 also impact project earnings? Maybe it's a request to increase project earnings, so option A could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
8 days ago
I think the risk manager is suggesting a change to the project scope, so option C makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christa
2 months ago
Wow, 80% increase in profitability? Sign me up! This has to be a request to increase project earnings. Option A is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Lucille
25 days ago
Yes, Option A seems like the best choice to maximize the project's profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
I think the risk manager is describing a request to increase project earnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 months ago
I agree, an 80% increase in profitability is definitely worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanja
2 months ago
I think the risk manager is challenging the stakeholder thresholds. Increasing the project's profitability by 80% is a significant change that could raise concerns among the stakeholders. Option C seems like the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
2 months ago
This is a clear-cut case of a request to increase project resources. By including Field 2, the company is expanding the scope of the project, which aligns with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Alisha
10 days ago
Yes, the risk manager is requesting to increase project resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
17 days ago
But wouldn't that also mean we need more resources for the project?
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
27 days ago
B: I agree, it could significantly increase our profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
29 days ago
I agree, it could significantly increase our profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
1 months ago
A: We should definitely consider including Field 2 in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
1 months ago
B: Agreed, it could significantly increase our profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 months ago
A: We should definitely consider including Field 2 in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
We should definitely consider including Field 2 in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tayna
2 months ago
But wouldn't it also mean taking on more risk by expanding the scope of the project?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
I agree with Hershel, including Field 2 will definitely boost the project's profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
3 months ago
I think the risk manager is describing a request to increase project earnings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77