Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-RMP Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

During the weekly project meeting a risk manager identified new risks in the last sprint, which might impact the project cost by implementing mitigation plans. The sponsor and some project team members do not agree that those risks can impact the project cost.

What should the risk manager do to resolve the sponsor and project team members' concerns about risk identification?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

German
1 months ago
Ah, the classic 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist' approach. The risk manager needs to bring in the big guns (the experts) to show the stakeholders what's really going on. Option D is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 months ago
The most knowledgeable members of the team should validate the risk identification processes. That way, the sponsor and team members can't argue with the findings. Option D is the winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
1 months ago
Haha, looks like the sponsor and team members are playing a game of 'Not My Problem.' The risk manager needs to highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Angella
3 days ago
Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
8 days ago
Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisandra
2 months ago
Wow, the sponsor and project team members are really not on the same page here. The risk manager needs to reinforce that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint. Option A is the best choice to resolve this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Janet
12 days ago
D) Ensure that the most knowledgeable members of the team validate risk identification processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
19 days ago
B) Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
23 days ago
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edna
2 months ago
I think the risk manager should conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders. That way they can see the data and understand the potential impact on the project cost. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
1 months ago
C) Conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 months ago
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curtis
2 months ago
Maybe conducting a separate meeting to discuss the analysis could help address concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
I agree with Mitsue. It's important to show that the process was followed correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
I think the risk manager should reinforce that the risk identification was done properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
2 months ago
I believe conducting a separate meeting to discuss the risk identification analysis could also help address concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
2 months ago
I agree with Maurine. It's important to show that the process was thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
3 months ago
I think the risk manager should reinforce that the risk identification was done properly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77