Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-RMP Topic 7 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 7
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

A project is delayed and the risk manager is working on a new plan for the remaining work Based on previous results the project team is having frequent issues with quality due to lack of experience in the technology used, requiring additional testing effort and rework.

How should the risk manager and team respond to this type of risk in the future?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tom
1 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going to go with (B) - transferring the risk with contractual clauses. That way, the client can share in the pain of the rework and inexperience. Plus, then I can blame them if things go wrong! Just kidding, of course. But seriously, (B) seems like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
1 days ago
Agreed, transparency is key in managing risks. Plus, sharing the risk can help mitigate the impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
8 days ago
I think (B) is a good option. It's important to make sure everyone is aware of the risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nakita
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards (C) - accepting the risk with contingency reserves. That way, the team can plan for the additional testing and rework, rather than trying to eliminate it entirely. Though I suppose (D) is also a solid option, if the team has the management reserves to spare.
upvoted 0 times
Ligia
2 days ago
That's true, but sometimes it's better to have a backup plan in case things don't go as smoothly as we hope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
10 days ago
But what if we could find a way to eliminate the need for rework altogether? Wouldn't that be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 months ago
I agree, having contingency reserves in place can help the team prepare for unexpected issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucina
2 months ago
Definitely go with (D) - mitigating the risk with management reserves. This allows the team to proactively address the quality issues and lack of experience, rather than just hoping for the best. Avoiding the risk (A) or transferring it (B) doesn't seem like the right call here.
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
6 days ago
I see your point, but I still think (D) is the most proactive approach to managing the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
10 days ago
I think (C) could also be a good choice to have contingency reserves in case things go wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
16 days ago
I agree, (D) is the best option to address the quality issues and lack of experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I think the best approach is to mitigate the risk with management reserves (D). Avoiding the risk by eliminating rework waste (A) might not be feasible, and transferring the risk (B) doesn't really address the root cause. Accepting the risk (C) could be risky, pun intended.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
12 days ago
In that case, transferring the risk with contractual clauses (B) could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
16 days ago
That's true, but sometimes rework is unavoidable due to lack of experience in the technology used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
18 days ago
But wouldn't it be better to avoid the risk by eliminating rework waste (A) in the first place?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
I agree, mitigating the risk with management reserves (D) seems like the most practical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annamae
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to avoid the risk by eliminating rework waste?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
I agree, using management reserves is a good way to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
We should mitigate the risk with management reserves.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77