Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-PBA Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

A major stakeholder of a project is surprised to learn that a particular requirement was not implemented during the latest launch.

The business analyst tells the stakeholder that the requirement status was changed to "deferred ''

What could have prevented the stakeholder from being surprised about the status change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Catrice
1 months ago
Maybe the stakeholder should have been reading the project status reports instead of playing Candy Crush. C) is the correct answer, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 months ago
D) is tempting, but the traceability matrix is useless if no one checks it. C) is the right call, communicate with the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
1 months ago
Haha, reminds me of the time my boss asked about a feature that was 'lost in the sauce' for months. C) is the way to go, keep everyone informed!
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
1 days ago
B) The status should have been reviewed prior to project launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
2 days ago
C) The status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
18 days ago
A) The status should have been communicated to the requirement's source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malika
1 months ago
Wow, the project manager really dropped the ball on this one. B) is the obvious choice - the status should have been reviewed before launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 months ago
The stakeholder should have been in the loop from the beginning. C) is the correct answer - the status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Stakeholder: It should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
8 days ago
Business Analyst: The status was changed to 'deferred'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
16 days ago
Stakeholder: Why wasn't the requirement implemented?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamika
2 months ago
Definitely, that would have prevented the surprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
2 months ago
Yeah, the status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
3 months ago
I can't believe the requirement was deferred without us knowing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77