Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-PBA Topic 6 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam

Question #: 77
Topic #: 6

[All PMI-PBA Questions]

A project team has 120 days to deliver a solution, but the stakeholders have too many requirements for the delivery window. What requirements prioritization technique should be used to determine which requirements will be delivered?

AMultivoting

BMoSCoW

CTime-boxing

DBudget analysis

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Larue at May 09, 2024, 10:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Casie

2 months ago

Gotta love those stakeholders and their endless requirements! B) MoSCoW is definitely the way to go to keep this project from turning into a dumpster fire.

upvoted 0 times

Dorothy

5 days ago

Multivoting could also be useful to get everyone's input on priorities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

8 days ago

I agree, it helps to focus on what must be delivered first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

2 months ago

MoSCoW is a great technique to prioritize requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Erick

2 months ago

Time-boxing? Really? C) Time-boxing is more about managing the schedule, not prioritizing requirements. B) MoSCoW is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

Alex

1 months ago

B) MoSCoW is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

1 months ago

Time-boxing? Really? C) Time-boxing is more about managing the schedule, not prioritizing requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tawna

2 months ago

I'm not sure about MoSCoW, I think Time-boxing could also be a good option to manage the requirements within the delivery window.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

2 months ago

A) Multivoting could work too, but MoSCoW is probably a safer bet in this scenario. It's more structured and provides clearer guidance.

upvoted 0 times

Moon

20 days ago

D) Budget analysis may not be as relevant for prioritizing requirements in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

21 days ago

C) Time-boxing could also be useful to ensure requirements are delivered within the 120-day window.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

1 months ago

B) I agree, MoSCoW helps prioritize requirements based on their importance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

2 months ago

A) Multivoting could work too, but MoSCoW is probably a safer bet in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Gerry

2 months ago

I'd go with B) MoSCoW. It's a classic requirements prioritization technique that works great when you have too many requirements and not enough time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

2 months ago

B) MoSCoW seems like the obvious choice here. It allows the team to prioritize the must-haves and negotiate the nice-to-haves with the stakeholders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teresita

2 months ago

I agree with Arlette, MoSCoW will help us identify the must-haves for the project delivery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

3 months ago

I think we should use the MoSCoW technique to prioritize the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77