Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-ACP Topic 5 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 5
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

An agile team discovers a new risk and identifies that its impact may be severe. What should an agile practitioner recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gwenn
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go, unless of course, the risk involves a herd of angry llamas. Then all bets are off!
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
6 days ago
D) Update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
6 days ago
C: Unless those llamas are involved, then we might need a different plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
12 days ago
B) Balance risk reduction and value adding activities in the next iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
19 days ago
B: Definitely, that seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
19 days ago
B) Balance risk reduction and value adding activities in the next iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
1 months ago
A: We should balance risk reduction and value adding activities in the next iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
2 months ago
A) Add a goal to the current iteration to fully mitigate or control the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
2 months ago
Option C? Are you kidding me? Maintaining velocity at the expense of addressing a severe risk? That's just plain reckless.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Dedicating an entire iteration to mitigating the risk seems like the most proactive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the prudent choice. Updating the risk register and seeking guidance from a risk specialist is the responsible thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
Jesus
1 months ago
D) Update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 months ago
A) Add a goal to the current iteration to fully mitigate or control the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
1 months ago
D) Update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
2 months ago
A) Add a goal to the current iteration to fully mitigate or control the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
2 months ago
I think updating the risk register and seeking direction from a risk specialist would be a good idea too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
2 months ago
I agree with Tracey, it's important to address the severe impact of the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Balancing risk reduction and value-adding activities is crucial in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
Afton
14 days ago
So, we should go with both options B and D to effectively manage the new risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
15 days ago
Yes, that's a good point. We need to make sure we have expert advice on how to handle the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
21 days ago
But shouldn't we also update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist?
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
I agree, balancing risk reduction and value-adding activities is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracey
3 months ago
I think we should add a goal to mitigate the risk in the current iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77