Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-ACP Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 1
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

The amount of information captured in the project's defects is varying within the development team. Team members are becoming frustrated with the defect quality inconsistencies and the frequent clarification required.

What should be done to address the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jolanda
1 months ago
I'm just waiting for someone to suggest we hold a special 'Defect Quality Appreciation Day' and give out trophies for the best-written bug reports.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
5 days ago
C) Generate insights at the next retrospective and adjust processes as decided by the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
8 days ago
B) Discuss and explore solutions in the next planning meeting and take corrective actions as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
16 days ago
A) Stop the current iteration to discuss defect quality issues and explore solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Monte
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Both seem viable, but I'd lean towards C just to make sure we don't forget about this issue in the heat of the planning meeting.
upvoted 0 times
Delpha
5 days ago
Definitely. Let's make sure to prioritize this and make the necessary changes as a team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
14 days ago
Yeah, that sounds like a solid plan. It's important to make sure we don't overlook this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
17 days ago
I think C is a good option. We can address the issue during the retrospective and adjust processes accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerri
2 months ago
Option C is my pick. A retrospective is the ideal time to generate insights and adjust processes as a team. This way, we can make sure everyone's voice is heard and the solution is tailored to the team's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
2 months ago
I agree with Brittney. Stopping the current iteration might be overkill, and assigning corrective actions to the backlog could lead to delays. The planning meeting is the perfect opportunity to address this.
upvoted 0 times
Jillian
11 days ago
C) Generate insights at the next retrospective and adjust processes as decided by the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
16 days ago
B) Discuss and explore solutions in the next planning meeting and take corrective actions as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 months ago
A) Stop the current iteration to discuss defect quality issues and explore solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
2 months ago
I believe we should generate insights at the next retrospective and adjust processes as decided by the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
2 months ago
Option B seems the most reasonable. Discussing and exploring solutions in the next planning meeting allows the team to address the issue without disrupting the current iteration.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
1 months ago
C) Generate insights at the next retrospective and adjust processes as decided by the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
2 months ago
B) Discuss and explore solutions in the next planning meeting and take corrective actions as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
2 months ago
I agree with Rene, it's important to address the issue immediately to avoid further frustrations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
2 months ago
I think we should stop the current iteration to discuss the defect quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77