Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-ACP Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 1
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

The amount of information captured in the project's defects is varying within the development team. Team members are becoming frustrated with the defect quality inconsistencies and the frequent clarification required.

What should be done to address the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Option C is my pick. A retrospective is the ideal time to generate insights and adjust processes as a team. This way, we can make sure everyone's voice is heard and the solution is tailored to the team's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 days ago
I agree with Brittney. Stopping the current iteration might be overkill, and assigning corrective actions to the backlog could lead to delays. The planning meeting is the perfect opportunity to address this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
12 days ago
I believe we should generate insights at the next retrospective and adjust processes as decided by the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
14 days ago
Option B seems the most reasonable. Discussing and exploring solutions in the next planning meeting allows the team to address the issue without disrupting the current iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
16 days ago
I agree with Rene, it's important to address the issue immediately to avoid further frustrations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
18 days ago
I think we should stop the current iteration to discuss the defect quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77