PeopleCert Exam DevSecOps Topic 4 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevSecOps exam

Question #: 51
Topic #: 4

[All DevSecOps Questions]

Which of the following BEST represents a key principle of a peer code review?

AA peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process

BA peer code review allows an organization to avoid using a formal change process

CA peer code review enables deep worn and task speculation to improve the reliability of software

DA peer code review enables management to take a hands-off approach to quality assurance

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Leonor at Jan 28, 2025, 04:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DevSecOps Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elke

1 months ago

I bet the person who wrote C is the same one who came up with 'alternative facts'. What a joke!

upvoted 0 times

Quentin

19 days ago

D) A peer code review enables management to take a hands-off approach to quality assurance

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

20 days ago

B) A peer code review allows an organization to avoid using a formal change process

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

27 days ago

A) A peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

1 months ago

D is laughable. Peer reviews are all about active engagement, not a 'hands-off' approach. Management better be involved!

upvoted 0 times

Susy

12 days ago

I agree, management should definitely be involved in peer code reviews

upvoted 0 times

...

France

19 days ago

C) A peer code review enables deep worn and task speculation to improve the reliability of software

upvoted 0 times

...

Joesph

1 months ago

A) A peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process

upvoted 0 times

...

Leila

2 months ago

C is just nonsense. 'Deep worn and task speculation'? I think someone needs to go back to English class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

2 months ago

B? No way! Peer reviews are meant to complement the change process, not bypass it. That's a recipe for disaster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

2 months ago

I also think A) is the best choice, it's important to identify issues sooner rather than later.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desire

2 months ago

I agree with Dick, catching defects early is crucial for quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

2 months ago

A is definitely the best answer here. Peer code reviews are all about catching issues early and improving the overall quality of the software.

upvoted 0 times

Thurman

1 months ago

Peer code reviews are a great way to ensure code quality and collaboration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carolann

1 months ago

It also allows for knowledge sharing and learning from each other.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hui

2 months ago

Definitely, it helps improve the overall quality of the software.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

2 months ago

I agree, catching defects early is crucial in peer code reviews.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

2 months ago

I think A) is the best option because it helps catch defects early.

upvoted 0 times

...