To reduce the cost of removing defects, inspections should be emphasized, together with any other cost-effective techniques. The role of functional system testing should then be changed to one of gathering quality data on the programs.
True. Inspections are like a secret weapon in the battle against bugs - cheap, effective, and often overlooked. Who needs functional testing when you've got eagle-eyed inspectors?
I'm not sure about this one. Functional system testing is still an important part of the quality assurance process, even if the focus is shifted to gathering data.
I think the statement is true. Inspections are a cost-effective way to identify defects early in the development process, which can save a lot of money in the long run.
Nadine
27 days agoGerardo
24 hours agoSharan
1 months agoDudley
1 months agoLashon
20 days agoJanna
27 days agoLura
1 months agoDonette
4 days agoKayleigh
8 days agoMicah
26 days agoMirta
2 months agoSalena
1 months agoDeane
1 months agoBlossom
1 months agoLuther
1 months agoYoko
2 months agoVince
2 months agoYoko
2 months ago