Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSSA87V1 Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions]

A travel reservation servicing case includes a service level for responding to requests. The service level intervals vary according to passenger status, class of service, and fare type.

Which implementation satisfies this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Maryanne
21 days ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma: do I go for the simple, straightforward solution, or do I over-engineer the heck out of it? I think I'll just flip a coin and hope for the best. After all, that's how most of us make decisions in this industry, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
22 days ago
D is the way to go! Keep it simple, right? Who needs all those fancy multivariate rules and circumstance definitions? Just a single property circumstanced rule, and you're good to go. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Sanjuana
11 days ago
I agree, keeping it simple with a single property circumstanced rule is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noble
28 days ago
C seems like the easiest solution, but I'm not sure if it fully satisfies the requirement. The question does say the intervals vary, so a single property rule might not be enough. I'll go with B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. A multivariate circumstanced rule might be overkill, and a single property circumstanced rule could work if the intervals are simple enough. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The requirement specifically mentions varying service level intervals based on passenger status, class of service, and fare type, so a multivariate circumstanced rule with a circumstance definition and template seems like the appropriate implementation.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
28 days ago
I agree, B seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B makes more sense because it involves creating a circumstance definition and template.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77