Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSA87V1 Topic 14 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSA87V1 exam

Question #: 48
Topic #: 14

Using the following Refund case life cycle, how do you design this case to skip the Item Return stage if the item will not be returned?

AReplace the Wait step in the Item Return stage with a Change Stage step.

BAdd a condition to skip the Item Return stage when a return is not necessary.

CAdd an Item Retention alternate stage and define a process for retention of item.

DAdd a decision in the Item Return process to change the stage when a return is not necessary.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Carla at Aug 25, 2024, 12:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elsa

2 months ago

Hmm, this question is a real brain-teaser. I'm tempted to go with option C and build a custom retention stage. But then again, my grandma always said, 'Keep it simple, silly!'

upvoted 0 times

Shonda

23 days ago

C) Add an Item Retention alternate stage and define a process for retention of item.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

1 months ago

B) Add a condition to skip the Item Return stage when a return is not necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

1 months ago

A) Replace the Wait step in the Item Return stage with a Change Stage step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

2 months ago

As an engineer, I'd go with option B. Keep it simple - no need to overcomplicate things when a simple skip will do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

Nada

26 days ago

I prefer option A, it seems like a more efficient way to skip the Item Return stage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

27 days ago

I think option C could also work well, providing a clear process for item retention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Long

2 months ago

I agree, option B seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

2 months ago

C is a creative approach, adding an alternate stage for item retention. Covers the scenario well, but might be a bit more complex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaquana

3 months ago

But wouldn't adding a condition be more efficient?

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lottie

3 months ago

Option D is interesting, adding a decision point to change the stage. That gives more control over the process flow.

upvoted 0 times

Noble

2 months ago

Creating an Item Retention alternate stage could be helpful in defining a process for retaining the item instead of returning it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

2 months ago

Replacing the Wait step in the Item Return stage with a Change Stage step sounds like a practical approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanda

2 months ago

I think adding a condition to skip the Item Return stage when a return is not necessary could also be a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryll

2 months ago

Option D is interesting, adding a decision point to change the stage. That gives more control over the process flow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michel

3 months ago

Option B seems the most straightforward way to handle this case. Skip the stage when a return is not necessary - simple and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaquana

3 months ago

I think the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...