Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPDS88V1 Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPDS88V1 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 4
[All PEGACPDS88V1 Questions]

Which decision component allows you to monitor the real-time performance of a third- party Churn Model?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

As a data scientist, a valid reason to adjust the default response timeout in a prediction is tosuit the use case.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Bettina
22 days ago
The Predictive Model is the way to go. It's like having a crystal ball for your third-party Churn Model. Real-time performance? Piece of cake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
23 days ago
Adaptive Model, for sure! It's like the model can just adapt to any situation, you know? No need to worry about real-time performance when you've got an Adaptive Model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
25 days ago
Wait, what's a Churn Model? Is that like a blender for churning butter? I'm going with the PMML Model, just because it sounds the most technical.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
9 days ago
PMML Model sounds like a good choice. It's a way to monitor real-time performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
The Scorecard Model seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for third-party Churn Models. Hmm, tough choice.
upvoted 0 times
Huey
16 days ago
I think the Predictive Model might be the best option for monitoring third-party Churn Models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
24 days ago
True, the PMML Model could also be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
1 months ago
I agree, but the Adaptive Model might be more suitable for real-time monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 months ago
I think the Scorecard Model is a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense. I see your point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's A) Scorecard Model because it provides real-time performance monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 months ago
I think the Predictive Model is the right choice here. It's designed to monitor real-time performance, so it seems like the obvious answer.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
18 days ago
I think the Scorecard Model could also be a good choice, as it provides a simple way to monitor and evaluate the performance of the Churn Model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
24 days ago
I see your point, but I still think the Predictive Model is the most suitable option for monitoring real-time performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
25 days ago
I think the Adaptive Model could also be a good choice for monitoring the real-time performance of a third-party Churn Model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
1 months ago
I agree, the Predictive Model is the best option for monitoring real-time performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
1 months ago
Actually, I think the Adaptive Model might be a better choice in this scenario. It can adjust to changing data and improve over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 months ago
I agree, the Predictive Model is specifically designed for monitoring real-time performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) Adaptive Model.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77