Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPDC88V1 Topic 7 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPDC88V1 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 7
[All PEGACPDC88V1 Questions]

MyCo, a mobile company, uses Pega Customer Decision Hub to display offers to customers on its website. The company wants to present more relevant offers to customers based on customer behavior. The following diagram is the action hierarchy in the Next-Best-Action Designer.

The company wants to present offers from both the groups and arbitrate across the two groups to select the best offer based on customer behavior.

The company wants to present offers from both the groups and arbitrate across the two groups to select the best offer based on customer behavior.

As a decisioning architect, what do you configure to select the best offer from both groups based on customer behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Increasing stage upweighting is a feature that allows you to gradually increase the weight of a stage over time, making the offers in that stage more likely to be selected. This is useful for promoting offers that are time-sensitive or have a limited availability. In this case, the bank wants to actively increase offers promotion over time, so enabling increasing stage upweighting for the second stage of the journey, where the offers are presented, is the best option. Verified Reference: [Pega Decisioning Consultant | Pega Academy]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rueben
1 months ago
Alright, let's do this! I'm feeling confident about this one. Option D just seems to make the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
7 days ago
User 3: I agree, that would help in selecting the best offer based on customer behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 days ago
User 2: Yeah, creating a prioritization decision strategy at the Group-level sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
12 days ago
User 1: I think Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
2 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'm not sure if the business value or the propensity is the right approach here. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Claudio
11 days ago
Creating an adaptive model rule at the Issue-level might be the key to selecting the best offer based on customer behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
12 days ago
Maybe ensuring that the propensity is enabled in the Arbitration tab could help in selecting the best offer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
24 days ago
I believe creating a prioritization decision strategy at the Group-level is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 months ago
I think enabling a business value in the prioritization formula would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
The question seems straightforward. I think the answer is D - Create a prioritization decision strategy at the Group-level. That's the logical way to select the best offer across the two groups based on customer behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
18 days ago
Yes, that's the most logical option to select the best offer based on customer behavior across both groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 months ago
I agree, D seems like the correct choice. It makes sense to create a prioritization decision strategy at the Group-level.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Ensure that the propensity is enabled in Arbitration tab could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
I agree with Vashti. It makes sense to create a strategy at the Group-level to select the best offer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) Create a prioritization decision strategy at the Group-level.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77