Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB Exam ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

A small deaning services organisation is about to start work on a hospital dleaning contract for the local Health Trust. You, as auditor, are conducting a Stage 2 audit to ISO 9001 and review the contract with the Service Manager. The contract requires that a cleaning plan is produced. You: "How was the cleaning plan for the contract developed?" Service Manager: "We have a basic template that covers the materials, labour requirements and cleaning methods to be employed. Some of that is specified by the customer." You: "How does the plan deal with locations like the intensive care wards and the operating theatres, which are included in the contract?" Service Manager: "The basic plan covers general wards, but we will do more frequent cleaning in those areas if the hospital requests it." You: "Are you aware of the regulatory requirements for cleaning standards in hospitals?" Service Manager: "No. We depend on the hospital to look after that side of things in the contract." You decide to raise a non-conformity against section 8.2.2.a.1 of ISO 9001. You decide to raise another non-conformity against section 8.2.4 of ISO 9001 when finding that the cleaning plan was amended without the agreement of the Health Trust. A different cleaning chemical was substituted to that specified in the contract. At the follow- up audit, the corrective action proposed was to "obtain a concession from the Health Trust for use of the new chemical." Which one of the following options is the reason why you did not accept this action taken?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Wait, they're using a 'basic template' for a hospital cleaning contract? That's like using a 'basic template' for brain surgery - what could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
23 hours ago
Substituting chemicals without the customer's approval? That's a bold move, let's see how it plays out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
6 days ago
Hah, 'obtain a concession' - sounds like they want to sweet-talk their way out of this one. Good luck with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
14 days ago
The proposed corrective action is wishful thinking. They need to address the contract change process properly, not just hope the Health Trust will go along with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
16 days ago
The Service Manager seems to have a limited understanding of the hospital's regulatory requirements. Relying on the customer to manage that is a concerning oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
16 days ago
I think the reason the Magdalene did not accept the proposed action is because the process for making changes to the contract has not been addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
21 days ago
We thought it would be more effective for the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
23 days ago
Why was a different cleaning chemical used without agreement?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77