Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSE Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's Palo Alto Networks Certified Security Engineer PAN-OS 11.0 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All Palo Alto Networks Certified Security Engineer PAN-OS 11.0 Questions]

Why are external zones required to be configured on a Palo Alto Networks NGFW in an environment with multiple virtual systems?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

External zones are a unique zone type on Palo Alto Networks firewalls that facilitate the movement of traffic between virtual systems on the same physical appliance. These zones are required when multiple virtual systems (vsys) are configured on a single firewall and there is a need to allow inter-vsys traffic without the need for the traffic to leave the firewall and re-enter. An external zone is associated with a specific virtual system and enables traffic to pass from one virtual system to another securely, thereby simplifying traffic management and reducing the need for additional physical interfaces or external routing to handle inter-vsys communication.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Candidate 1: I think external zones are required to separate traffic between different virtual systems for security purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
22 days ago
I second that! At this rate, we'll be debating this question until the cows come home. Time to make a decision and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
23 days ago
Hmm, I'm leaning more towards option C. I think the idea is that the same external zone can be used across different virtual systems, which would make management a bit easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
24 days ago
Haha, you know what they say - too many cooks in the kitchen! Let's just go with option C and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
Chau
5 days ago
Agreed, let's go with option C and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
6 days ago
Exactly, let's keep it simple and efficient with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
7 days ago
No need to overcomplicate things, option C it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
8 days ago
That's true, it simplifies the configuration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
9 days ago
I agree, having the same external zone for different virtual systems makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
10 days ago
Option C sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirby
25 days ago
This question seems a bit tricky. At first glance, I'm thinking that option A might be the correct answer, as it would allow traffic between zones in different virtual systems without leaving the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77