Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam SSE-Engineer Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's SSE-Engineer exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 2
[All SSE-Engineer Questions]

Which policy configuration in Prisma Access Browser (PAB) will protect an organization from malicious BYOD and minimize the impact on the user experience?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In Prisma Access Browser (PAB), allowing access to applications while enforcing data masking or watermarking provides security for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) users without heavily impacting the user experience. Data masking ensures that sensitive information is obscured, reducing the risk of data leakage, while watermarking can deter unauthorized screenshots or data exfiltration. This approach balances security and usability, allowing users to work efficiently while protecting corporate data.


by Lynda at May 03, 2025, 06:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SSE-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rosendo
5 days ago
Option B, baby! Session recording is the only way to keep an eye on those sneaky BYOD users. Trust no one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 days ago
I agree with Lashonda, data masking or watermarking can protect the organization without impacting user experience too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
8 days ago
Hold up, are we talking about Prisma Access Browser or Prisma Access Blender? I'm so confused right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
9 days ago
But wouldn't allowing access to applications with data masking or watermarking be a good compromise?
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
11 days ago
I disagree, I believe the policy that blocks elements like screen scrapers is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
24 days ago
Dude, if you're not blocking file exchange, you're just asking for trouble. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
26 days ago
I don't know, man. I'm more of a 'let the users do their thing' kind of guy. Option D sounds like it might be more user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Blocking those pesky screen scrapers is a must for any serious BYOD policy.
upvoted 0 times
Tyisha
7 days ago
User 1: I agree, blocking screen scrapers is crucial for BYOD security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
1 months ago
I think the policy that blocks file exchange would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77