Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-StrataDC Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-StrataDC exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-StrataDC Questions]

How does Twistlock offer workload security at runtime?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Stephen
1 months ago
Twistlock must have some serious magic powers if it can 'automatically' do all these things. I hope their support team is ready for a lot of calls!
upvoted 0 times
Sherell
5 days ago
User 3: Twistlock also works with the IDP to restrict network access for over-privileged containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
15 days ago
User 2: That's impressive, but I wonder how effective it is in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
18 days ago
User 1: Twistlock uses a whitelist security model for containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catarina
1 months ago
Ha, quarantining containers based on resource usage? Option B sounds like it's trying to catch the symptoms, not the root cause. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 months ago
Hmm, Option C seems a bit too good to be true. Automatically patching vulnerabilities and compliance issues for every container and service? That's almost too convenient!
upvoted 0 times
Huey
8 days ago
User 3: I think it's important to still have some level of control and oversight, even with automated patching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
24 days ago
User 2: I agree, it would save a lot of time and effort if vulnerabilities were patched automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
25 days ago
User 1: Option C does sound too good to be true, but it would definitely make things easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eric
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Integrating with the IDP to identify and restrict over-privileged access is a great way to mitigate potential security risks at runtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the most comprehensive solution for securing workloads at runtime. Automatically building a whitelist security model is crucial for maintaining control over container and service behaviors.
upvoted 0 times
Angella
11 days ago
User 3: It's important to have automated security measures in place to protect containers and services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
19 days ago
User 3: It's important to have that level of control over container and service behaviors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
20 days ago
User 2: I agree, having a whitelist security model in place can help prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
21 days ago
User 2: I agree, having a whitelist security model in place can help prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
22 days ago
User 1: Option D does sound like a solid approach for securing workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
1 months ago
User 1: Option D does sound like a solid approach for securing workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
2 months ago
I agree with both of you. Twistlock not only restricts network access but also monitors resource usage for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
2 months ago
I believe Twistlock also quarantines containers with high CPU and memory usage to ensure security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 months ago
I think Twistlock offers workload security by working with the IDP to restrict network access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
2 months ago
I agree with both of you. Twistlock not only restricts network access but also monitors resource usage for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
3 months ago
I believe Twistlock also quarantines containers with high CPU and memory usage to ensure security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
3 months ago
I think Twistlock offers workload security by working with the IDP to restrict network access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77