D sounds like a workaround, but I'm not a fan of relying on network equipment to do the conversion. Seems like an unnecessary step that could introduce complexity.
I heard that Palo Alto Networks does not integrate natively with VXLAN tagging, but network equipment can convert VXLAN flows to VLANs and send those VLANs to Palo Alto Networks firewalls.
I believe that Palo Alto Networks does not integrate with VXLAN tagging, so virtual appliances cannot be provided, but hardware appliances can be offered at the data center gateway border.
Option C looks the most promising, but I'm not sure about the 'if they are provided by VMware' part. Shouldn't Palo Alto integrate natively regardless of the VXLAN provider?
Arletta
Scarlet
8 days agoJesse
12 days agoRodrigo
14 days agoShawnta
15 days agoFrancisca
15 days agoMyra
17 days ago