Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-SASE Topic 3 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-SASE exam

Question #: 54
Topic #: 3

[All PSE-SASE Questions]

What is a benefit of deploying secure access service edge (SASE) with a secure web gateway (SWG) over a SASE solution without a SWG?

AA heartbeat connection between the firewall peers ensures seamless failover in the event that a peer goes down.

BIt prepares the keys and certificates required for decryption, creating decryption profiles and policies, and configuring decryption port mirroring.

CProtection is offered in the cloud through a unified platform for complete visibility and precise control over web access while enforcing security policies that protect users from hostile websites.

DIt creates tunnels that allow users and systems to connect securely over a public network as if they were connecting over a local area network (LAN).

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Willetta at Jan 23, 2025, 12:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-SASE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Loreta

2 days ago

Wait, does the SWG come with a complimentary crystal ball to predict when the firewall peers will go down? I'm going with C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dolores

13 days ago

As a network admin, I'd love the seamless failover described in option A, but C appears to be the most relevant benefit of SASE with SWG.

upvoted 0 times

Delisa

2 days ago

A) A heartbeat connection between the firewall peers ensures seamless failover in the event that a peer goes down.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Stephaine

17 days ago

Haha, option D sounds like it's describing a good old-fashioned VPN, not SASE. I'll go with C on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Nidia

11 days ago

User 1: I agree, option D does sound like a VPN.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Julene

22 days ago

I'm torn between B and C. Both options sound like they address key aspects of SASE with SWG, but C seems more complete.

upvoted 0 times

Carla

3 days ago

B is important too, it prepares keys and certificates required for decryption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

7 days ago

I agree, C provides protection in the cloud through a unified platform.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mee

11 days ago

I think C is the better choice. It offers complete visibility and control over web access.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Pearly

1 months ago

But what about the seamless failover with a heartbeat connection between firewall peers? That seems like a valuable benefit too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

1 months ago

Option C seems like a comprehensive answer. Securing web access while enforcing policies in the cloud is a huge advantage.

upvoted 0 times

Jenise

11 days ago

User 2: I agree, it's important to protect users from malicious websites. Option C seems like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julian

13 days ago

User 1: Option C is definitely a game-changer. Having complete visibility and control over web access is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tish

1 months ago

I agree with Gwenn. Having complete visibility and precise control over web access is crucial for security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

1 months ago

I think the benefit of deploying SASE with SWG is the protection offered in the cloud through a unified platform.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77