Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Platform Topic 1 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 1

A price sensitive customer wants to prevent attacks on a windows 2008 Virtual Server. The server will max out at 100Mbps but needs to have 45,000 sessions to connect to multiple hosts within a data center

Which VM instance should be used to secure the network by this customer?

AVM-200

BVM-100

CVM-300

DVM-50

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Susana at Jul 17, 2024, 03:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lachelle

10 months ago

I wonder if the VM-50 can do the job with a bit of optimization. It might be a more budget-friendly option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casandra

10 months ago

I'm no network expert, but the VM-300 sounds like it can handle the job. Plus, it has a cool name - who doesn't love a big, powerful VM?

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

11 months ago

Hmm, the VM-200 could be a good compromise between performance and cost. But the VM-300 might be the safer bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

11 months ago

The VM-100 seems a bit underpowered for this scenario. I'd go with the VM-300 to be on the safe side.

upvoted 0 times

Yan

10 months ago

VM-300 should be able to handle the load and keep the network secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dino

10 months ago

I agree, VM-300 seems like a safer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

10 months ago

I think the VM-200 could also handle the workload, but the VM-300 would provide better security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

10 months ago

I agree, the VM-300 would be the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryrose

10 months ago

I think VM-100 might not be enough for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

11 months ago

That makes sense, thanks for explaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorenza

11 months ago

VM-200 has higher capacity and can handle more sessions, which is important for connecting to multiple hosts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

11 months ago

I think the VM-300 would be a great choice to secure the network. It can handle the high traffic and session requirements.

upvoted 0 times

Maxima

10 months ago

I think VM-300 is worth the investment for better security and performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charisse

10 months ago

True, VM-200 could work too. It depends on the customer's budget and specific needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

10 months ago

But wouldn't VM-200 also be a good choice? It's a bit cheaper and might still meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

11 months ago

I agree, VM-300 seems like the best option for this customer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

11 months ago

Why do you think VM-200 is better?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorenza

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe VM-200 would be a better choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

11 months ago

I think the customer should go with VM-100.

upvoted 0 times

...