Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Endpoint Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

An administrator would like to add Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper to the exploit prevention policy for macOS. In order to achieve this task, which option should be added to the macOS protected processes list?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hana
1 months ago
I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to troubleshoot a Chrome crash. That would be a real 'helper' headache, if you know what I mean. *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
2 months ago
B all the way! We don't want any surprises with those Chrome helpers lurking around. Better safe than sorry, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Charisse
15 days ago
C) chrome*
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
20 days ago
B) google chrome and google chrome helper
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
21 days ago
A) chrome app
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mira
2 months ago
I'm going to have to go with D. Google Chrome is the main executable, so that should do the trick, right?
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
11 days ago
Actually, I think D is the correct option. Google Chrome is the main executable that needs to be added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
23 days ago
I agree with you, B seems like the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
1 months ago
I think B is the best option. It includes both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
2 months ago
C looks tempting, but I'm worried that the wildcard might catch more processes than intended. Better to be precise with B, I think.
upvoted 0 times
Jettie
12 days ago
Yeah, better to be safe than sorry. B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
1 months ago
I think B is the best choice to avoid any unintended processes being caught.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
2 months ago
I agree, being precise with B is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jani
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) chrome* might also be a valid option since it includes both Chrome and Chrome Helper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
I agree with Queenie. Adding both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper to the exploit prevention policy makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper seem like the most specific and comprehensive options here.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
1 months ago
Yes, B is the most specific choice to ensure both applications are included in the exploit prevention policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
I agree, B seems like the best option to cover both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queenie
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) google chrome and google chrome helper.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77