Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Endpoint Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 2
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

An Administrator has identified an EPM-triggered false positive and has used the Create Rule button from within the relevant entry in the Security Events > Preventions > Exploits tab. What is the result of the created rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquline
11 months ago
D is definitely the way to go. Precision is key when dealing with these security events. Don't want to be overzealous, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 months ago
I'm going with B. Seems like the most targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
10 months ago
Definitely, it's important to have specific rules in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
That's true, it's a targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
10 months ago
Agreed, it focuses on stopping EPM injection into processes on the specific machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
11 months ago
I think B is the best option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
11 months ago
I agree with Angella, option D provides more information for better tracking and management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
11 months ago
But option D mentions including specific details which seems more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
11 months ago
I think the result of the created rule is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
12 months ago
D makes the most sense to me. Gotta love all the details in that rule, right? Bet the security team is thrilled about that.
upvoted 0 times
Ceola
11 months ago
Yeah, having all those details in the rule definitely helps the security team in understanding and managing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
11 months ago
D) The new rule will include the EPM that raised the prevention, the process that triggered the prevention, the machine on which the prevention was triggered, and a descriptive name for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
B) The new rule stops all EPM injection into processes on the machine on which the prevention was triggered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
11 months ago
A) The new rule stops all EPM injection into the faulted process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Farrah
1 years ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is D. The rule should capture the details of the prevention, not just stop EPM injection in a broad way.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
11 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have all that information in the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
12 months ago
I think the answer is D. It captures all the details of the prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77