Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCSFE Topic 5 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCSFE exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 5
[All PCSFE Questions]

Which two elements of the Palo Alto Networks platform architecture enable security orchestration in a software-defined network (SDN)? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

App-ID is the component that can provide application-based segmentation and prevent lateral threat movement. Application-based segmentation is a method of dividing the network into smaller segments or zones based on application or workload characteristics, such as function, dependency, owner, or security posture. Lateral threat movement is a technique used by attackers to move across the network from one compromised host to another, looking for sensitive data or assets. App-ID is a feature that identifies and classifies applications and protocols based on their content and characteristics, regardless of port, encryption, or evasion techniques. App-ID can provide application-based segmentation and prevent lateral threat movement by applying granular security policies based on application information to each segment or connection, blocking unauthorized access or data exfiltration. DNS Security, NAT, and URL Filtering are not components that can provide application-based segmentation and prevent lateral threat movement, but they are related features that can enhance security and visibility. Reference:Palo Alto Networks Certified Software Firewall Engineer (PCSFE), [App-ID Overview], [Microsegmentation with Palo Alto Networks], [Lateral Movement]


by Callie at Apr 30, 2024, 02:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCSFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Willow
1 months ago
NVGRE? What is this, a question about Microsoft's legacy network virtualization protocol? I'll stick with A and C, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
1 months ago
I'm going to have to go with A and C as well. Can't really see how VXLAN or NVGRE are relevant for security orchestration in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
1 days ago
Having a full set of APIs and dynamic address groups definitely help with security automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
15 days ago
Yeah, VXLAN and NVGRE seem more network-focused rather than security-focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
19 days ago
I agree, A and C make the most sense for security orchestration in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyra
1 months ago
Ha! NVGRE, really? I thought we were talking about Palo Alto, not Windows Server. Definitely going with A and C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
1 months ago
I'm not sure about VXLAN and NVGRE - those sound more like network virtualization features rather than security orchestration.
upvoted 0 times
Refugia
6 days ago
I agree, VXLAN and NVGRE are more about network virtualization
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
7 days ago
C) Dynamic Address Groups to adapt Security policies dynamically
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
25 days ago
A) Full set of APIs enabling programmatic control of policy and configuration
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
2 months ago
A and C seem like the most relevant options here. The APIs and dynamic address groups are key for orchestrating security in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
Stanton
6 days ago
Definitely, those two elements provide the foundation for effective security in a software-defined network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
15 days ago
VXLAN and NVGRE are important too, but A and C are more directly related to security orchestration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
1 months ago
Having full API control and dynamic address groups really helps with automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
2 months ago
I agree, A and C are crucial for security orchestration in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
2 months ago
I'm not sure about VXLAN and NVGRE support. But A and C make sense to me for enabling security orchestration in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 months ago
I agree with Erick. Having APIs for programmatic control and dynamic address groups would definitely help in orchestrating security in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
I think A and C are the elements that enable security orchestration in a software-defined network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
2 months ago
I'm not sure about VXLAN and NVGRE support. But A and C make sense to me for enabling security orchestration in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
I agree with Flo. Having APIs for programmatic control and dynamic address groups would definitely help in orchestrating security in an SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
3 months ago
I think A and C are the elements that enable security orchestration in a software-defined network.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77