Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCSAE Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCSAE exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 4

[All PCSAE Questions]

The XSOAR administrator is writing an automation and would like to return an error entry back into XSOAR if a particular command errors out. How can this be achieved?

AUsing the demisto_error() function

BUsing a print statement

CUsing the demisto.debug() function

DUsing the return_error() function

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Novella at Apr 08, 2025, 09:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCSAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sylvia

29 days ago

B, the print statement? Really? That's like trying to put out a fire with a squirt gun. Use the return_error() function, my friend, and let XSOAR handle the error handling for you.

upvoted 0 times

Laticia

7 days ago

D) Using the return_error() function

upvoted 0 times

...

Grover

10 days ago

C) Using the demisto.debug() function

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

11 days ago

A) Using the demisto_error() function

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Leigha

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between A and D. Maybe I'll just ask the Magic 8 Ball to decide for me. *shakes 8 Ball* 'Reply hazy, try again.' Well, that's not very helpful!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

1 months ago

I'm going with D, the return_error() function. It's the industry standard for handling errors in automation scripts. Plus, it's got a nice ring to it, don't you think?

upvoted 0 times

Kris

1 days ago

return_error() is definitely the way to go. It's reliable and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecilia

4 days ago

I prefer using demisto.debug() for error handling. It gives more detailed information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

8 days ago

I think D is the way to go too. It's clean and simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tamesha

2 months ago

I'd say A, the demisto_error() function, is the way to go. It's more specific to the XSOAR platform, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Lorrie

24 days ago

That seems to be the consensus. A) it is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phung

27 days ago

I would go with A) Using the demisto_error() function as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

28 days ago

Yeah, I agree. It's specific to XSOAR.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

1 months ago

I think A) Using the demisto_error() function is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Farrah

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) Using the demisto.debug() function could also be a possible solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mi

2 months ago

I agree with Rutha. The return_error() function is specifically designed to return an error entry back into XSOAR.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

2 months ago

Definitely go with D, the return_error() function is the way to go. It's the official XSOAR way to handle errors in automations.

upvoted 0 times

Mignon

2 days ago

Using the demisto_error() function might also be a good option for error handling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

3 days ago

return_error() is definitely the way to go for handling errors in XSOAR automations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

4 days ago

I think demisto.debug() could also be useful for debugging purposes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Honey

5 days ago

I agree, return_error() is the best way to handle errors in XSOAR automations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

6 days ago

Using demisto_error() might work too, but return_error() is the recommended method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

8 days ago

return_error() is definitely the way to go, it provides a clear way to handle errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

1 months ago

I think demisto.debug() could also be useful for debugging purposes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veda

1 months ago

I agree, return_error() is the best option for handling errors in XSOAR automations.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Rutha

2 months ago

I think the answer is D) Using the return_error() function.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77