Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCCSE Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 3
[All PCCSE Questions]

A customer is reviewing Container audits, and an audit has identified a cryptominer attack. Which three options could have generated this audit? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, E

In the case of identifying a cryptominer attack through container audits, the options that could have generated this audit include B. High CPU usage over time for the container is detected, which is a common indicator of cryptomining activity as it consumes significant computational resources, C. Common cryptominer process name was found, which directly indicates the presence of cryptomining based on known malicious processes, and E. Common cryptominer port usage was found, suggesting cryptomining activity based on network behavior typical of such attacks.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Brock
6 days ago
I agree with Junita. High CPU usage, common cryptominer process name, and port usage are all indicators of a cryptominer attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
15 days ago
Wow, a cryptominer attack? I bet the customer is really mining for answers here! B, C, and E sound like the winning ticket.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
23 days ago
I think options B, C, and E could have generated this audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 months ago
B, C, and E are the correct options. The high CPU usage, common cryptominer process name, and port usage are all clear indicators of a cryptominer attack.
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
5 days ago
E) Common cryptominer port usage was found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
9 days ago
C) Common cryptominer process name was found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
17 days ago
B) High CPU usage over time for the container is detected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77