Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCCSE Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All PCCSE Questions]

The security team wants to target a CNAF policy for specific running Containers. How should the administrator scope the policy to target the Containers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Laura
3 days ago
Defender names? Really? That's like trying to herd cats. Namespaces all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 days ago
I'm gonna go with option B. Namespaces just make the most sense for this use case. Anything else would be like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
13 days ago
But targeting Image names would ensure specific running Containers are covered, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
17 days ago
I disagree, I believe scoping the policy to namespaces would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
19 days ago
Hmm, I think scoping the policy to namespaces would be the way to go. That's the most logical approach to target specific running containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
19 days ago
I think the administrator should scope the policy to Image names.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77