Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCCSE Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 3
[All PCCSE Questions]

A customer is reviewing Container audits, and an audit has identified a cryptominer attack. Which three options could have generated this audit? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, E

In the case of identifying a cryptominer attack through container audits, the options that could have generated this audit include B. High CPU usage over time for the container is detected, which is a common indicator of cryptomining activity as it consumes significant computational resources, C. Common cryptominer process name was found, which directly indicates the presence of cryptomining based on known malicious processes, and E. Common cryptominer port usage was found, suggesting cryptomining activity based on network behavior typical of such attacks.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ellen
10 days ago
I believe option D could also be a potential indicator. If the mined currency is associated with a user token, it could point to a cryptominer attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
10 days ago
The customer must be really crypto-curious about this one. I'd say B, C, and E are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
13 days ago
Hmm, I'd go with B, C, and E as well. Gotta keep an eye out for those sneaky cryptominers trying to dig into the system.
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
3 days ago
B) High CPU usage over time for the container is detected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brock
19 days ago
I agree with Junita. High CPU usage, common cryptominer process name, and port usage are all indicators of a cryptominer attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
28 days ago
Wow, a cryptominer attack? I bet the customer is really mining for answers here! B, C, and E sound like the winning ticket.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
1 days ago
I agree, B, C, and E are the likely culprits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
1 months ago
I think options B, C, and E could have generated this audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
B, C, and E are the correct options. The high CPU usage, common cryptominer process name, and port usage are all clear indicators of a cryptominer attack.
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
18 days ago
E) Common cryptominer port usage was found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
22 days ago
C) Common cryptominer process name was found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
1 months ago
B) High CPU usage over time for the container is detected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77