Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCCET Topic 7 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCET exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 7
[All PCCET Questions]

What should a security operations engineer do if they are presented with an encoded string during an incident investigation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hildegarde
1 months ago
This question is encoded just like the string they're asking about. I'm going to have to crack the cipher before I can even begin to answer it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'encoded string during an incident' conundrum. I'm feeling adventurous, so I'm going to have to go with A. What's the worst that could happen, right?
upvoted 0 times
Aliza
5 days ago
User 3: Better safe than sorry when dealing with encoded strings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
7 days ago
User 2: That sounds like a safe approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
18 days ago
User 1: I think I'll save it to a new file and run it in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyndy
2 months ago
Hmm, let's see... I'm going to have to go with B. VirusTotal is the perfect tool to check if this string is a known threat.
upvoted 0 times
Lino
18 days ago
User 3: I agree, VirusTotal is a great tool for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
1 months ago
User 2: No, we should run it against VirusTotal to check for any known threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should save it to a new file and run it in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 months ago
User 4: After that, we can decode the string and continue the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 months ago
User 3: I agree, appending it to the investigation notes without altering it is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
2 months ago
User 2: No, we should run it against VirusTotal to check for any known threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
User 1: I think we should save it to a new file and run it in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salina
2 months ago
I'm feeling a bit cautious here. I think C is the way to go - we don't want to accidentally run some malicious code, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Samira
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, better safe than sorry. Let's not take any risks with unknown encoded strings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, appending it to the investigation notes seems like a safe option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, we should definitely be careful with potentially harmful code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, appending it to the investigation notes seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
2 months ago
But what if it's a time-sensitive incident? Decoding the string might be necessary to continue the investigation quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
2 months ago
I agree with Jessenia, running it in a sandbox is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
3 months ago
I think we should save it to a new file and run it in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
3 months ago
Whoa, this is a real brain-teaser! I'm going to go with D - decoding the string seems like the logical next step to continue the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawn
1 months ago
User 4: Let's go with decoding the string then. It's the logical next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 months ago
User 3: I agree with Candida. Decoding the string seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
2 months ago
User 2: Carline, I disagree. I believe we should decode the string and continue the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
2 months ago
User 1: I think we should save it to a new file and run it in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77