Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam NGFW-Engineer Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's NGFW-Engineer exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 2
[All NGFW-Engineer Questions]

A multinational organization wants to use the Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) to aggregate identity data from multiple sources (on premises AD, Azure AD, Okta) while enforcing strict data isolation for different regional business units. Each region's firewalls, managed via Panorama, must only receive the user and group information relevant to that region. The organization aims to minimize administrative overhead while meeting data sovereignty requirements.

Which approach achieves this segmentation of identity data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To meet the requirement of data isolation for different regional business units while minimizing administrative overhead, the best approach is to establish separate Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) tenants for each business unit. Each tenant would be integrated with the relevant identity sources (such as on-premises AD, Azure AD, and Okta) for that specific region. This ensures that the identity data for each region is kept isolated and only relevant user and group data is distributed to the respective regional firewalls.

By maintaining a strict one-to-one mapping between CIE tenants and business units, the organization ensures that each region's firewall only receives the user and group data relevant to that region, thus meeting data sovereignty requirements and minimizing administrative complexity.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Pamella
2 days ago
That's a good point, Valentine. Option D does seem like a good balance between centralization and data isolation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
6 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. It allows for centralized management while still filtering and redistributing only relevant data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
12 days ago
I'd go with Option D. Segmenting the single tenant makes more sense than creating multiple tenants, and it still allows you to control the data flow effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
18 days ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to achieve the data isolation requirements. Separate tenants for each business unit is a clean and manageable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Devora
2 days ago
I agree, having separate tenants for each business unit makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
3 days ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to achieve the data isolation requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
19 days ago
I think option B is the best approach. It ensures strict data isolation for each regional business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77