Oracle Exam 1Z0-996-22 Topic 9 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-996-22 exam

Question #: 32
Topic #: 9

Your client has the following requirements:

Many customers are installing their own solar electrical generation equipment. When these customers generate more electricity than required for their own use, the surplus can he exported back to the power grid.

In order to measure this generation, we have installed special scalar devices. These devices have separate registers to measure the energy generated (export) and the energy received (import) from the National Grid. Both reads will be stored in kWh, but the import is subtractive and export is consumptive.

What solution should you choose to configure the measuring component types for these specific requirements?

ACreate two service points: one for subtractive import and the other for consumptive export.

BCreate one new measuring component type for creating two measuring components (one for import and the other for export) that will be linked to one scalar device.

CCreate one new measuring component type for creating a new measuring component that will be linked to two different scalar devices (one for import and the other for export).

DCreate two new measuring component types (one for subtractive import and the other for consumptive export) to enable the creation of two measuring components that will be linked to one scalar device.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Nicolette at Feb 10, 2024, 10:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-996-22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Judy

1 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with option B. It's the most elegant solution that still gives us the granular data we need. Plus, who doesn't love a good scalar device?

upvoted 0 times

Erin

4 days ago

Definitely, option B is the best fit for our requirements. Let's go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

27 days ago

I agree, option B seems like the most efficient choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

1 months ago

Option B sounds like the way to go. It keeps things simple and organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

2 months ago

Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure why we'd need two separate scalar devices. Seems a bit overkill if we can just use one and configure the measuring components accordingly.

upvoted 0 times

Hailey

3 days ago

But wouldn't it be more efficient to have one measuring component type linked to two scalar devices, like option C suggests?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

23 days ago

I agree, having separate service points would make it easier to track the energy generated and received.

upvoted 0 times

...

Velda

1 months ago

I think option A makes more sense. It's simpler to have two separate service points for import and export.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivienne

2 months ago

Haha, these power companies are really getting creative with their metering setups! I guess they want to make sure they're capturing every last watt, even if it means getting a bit complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alverta

2 months ago

I was thinking option D, since it allows for the creation of separate component types for import and export. That way, the system can clearly differentiate between the two types of measurements.

upvoted 0 times

Lenna

27 days ago

Yes, I think having separate component types for import and export will make it easier to manage and analyze the data effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desmond

1 months ago

I agree, option D seems like the best choice for this scenario. It provides a clear separation between import and export measurements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

2 months ago

Option B seems like the most straightforward solution to me. Creating two separate measuring components linked to one scalar device makes the most sense for tracking both import and export.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

2 months ago

I see both sides, but I think option D could work as well. Creating two new measuring component types for import and export could provide more flexibility in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option A is more suitable. Having two separate service points for import and export will make it easier to track and manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodney

2 months ago

I think option B is the best choice. It makes sense to have one new measuring component type for both import and export.

upvoted 0 times

...