Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-996-22 Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-996-22 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All 1Z0-996-22 Questions]

How do you ensure that specific Validation, Editing, and Estimation (VEE) rules are applied to estimated measurements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glenn
2 months ago
Option A? Adding the VEE Group to the Device Configuration Type? That's like trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Nah, I'm going with D.
upvoted 0 times
Kirby
19 days ago
Definitely, D is the way to go for ensuring specific VEE rules are applied correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
22 days ago
Yeah, adding the VEE Group as the Fallback VEE Group for the appropriate VEE role makes more sense than adding it to the Device Configuration Type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
1 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most appropriate option for applying VEE rules to estimated measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an absolute VEE-natic! But seriously, I think option D is the winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
23 days ago
It's all about ensuring accuracy and consistency in the data processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
1 months ago
Definitely, that way the specific VEE rules can be applied to estimated measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. It makes sense to have the VEE Group as the Fallback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cory
2 months ago
I was thinking option B, but after reading the question again, I'm not so sure. Estimation rules in the Manual Override VEE Group? Hmm, not sure that's the right way to do it.
upvoted 0 times
Marget
1 months ago
User2: I agree, that seems like the correct way to ensure the rules are applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 months ago
User1: I think it's D, adding the VEE Group as the Fallback VEE Group for the appropriate VEE role.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C could also be a valid option. Adding the VEE Group to the Device Type might also ensure that the rules are applied correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D. You have to add the VEE Group as the Fallback VEE Group for the appropriate VEE role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
2 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Adding the VEE Group as the Fallback VEE Group for the appropriate VEE role sounds like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
27 days ago
Yes, it ensures that the rules are consistently applied across the board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 months ago
It definitely simplifies the process of applying specific VEE rules to estimated measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
I agree, adding the VEE Group as the Fallback VEE Group for the appropriate VEE role is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
2 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coral
3 months ago
I think the answer is B, because you need to add the estimation rules to the Manual Override VEE Group to the Measuring Component Type.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77