Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-908 Topic 11 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-908 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 11
[All 1Z0-908 Questions]

Examine this output:

Which change should optimize the number of buffer pool instances for this workload?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erinn
1 months ago
I dunno, maybe we should just ask the database fairies for guidance on this one. They seem to have all the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
2 months ago
Hey, why not 13 instances? Feels like a more magical number, doesn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Launa
26 days ago
C) Decrease the number of buffer pool instances to 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
1 months ago
B) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 months ago
A) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 16.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
I'm going with option D - increase to 12 instances. Seems like a good balance between performance and resource utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
2 months ago
Hold up, decreasing to 1 instance? That's crazy talk! The whole point is to improve performance, not make it worse.
upvoted 0 times
Enola
21 days ago
User 3: I think increasing to 16 instances could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
28 days ago
User 2: Maybe increasing to 32 instances would be better for optimizing performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, decreasing to 1 instance doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dante
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards decreasing the instances to 4. Seems like the sweet spot for optimizing the buffer pool utilization.
upvoted 0 times
Boris
2 months ago
I agree, that seems like the best option for optimizing the buffer pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
I think decreasing to 4 instances is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
2 months ago
But wouldn't increasing it too much lead to resource wastage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
Hmm, increasing the buffer pool instances to 16 or 32 seems like overkill for this workload. Might be better to go with a more moderate approach.
upvoted 0 times
Nida
23 days ago
E) Decrease the number of buffer pool instances to 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 months ago
D) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 12.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
2 months ago
B) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
2 months ago
A) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 16.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Increase the number of buffer pool instances to 16.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77