Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-902 Topic 12 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-902 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 12
[All 1Z0-902 Questions]

Which two statements are true about applying updates on Exadata systems?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kayleigh
1 months ago
E is true, failed database server updates are rolled back automatically. It's like a built-in undo button for your Exadata!
upvoted 0 times
Novella
5 days ago
That's great to know! It's like having a safety net for updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roslyn
1 months ago
D is hilarious, a non-UEK kernel? That's like putting a Honda engine in a Ferrari. Exadata deserves the best!
upvoted 0 times
Rose
1 days ago
C) Updating kernel and RDMA packages on storage cells should be prevented by excluding them with the yum ---exclude option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
3 days ago
B) To speed up applying storage server updates in a rolling manner, updating two storage servers simultaneously is recommended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
7 days ago
A) Failed storage server updates are automatically rolled back to a previous release.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delisa
2 months ago
C is wrong, we want to update the kernel and RDMA packages, not exclude them. Gotta keep that Exadata up-to-date!
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
1 months ago
E) Failed database server updates are rolled back to a working state on a previous release automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
1 months ago
B) To speed up applying storage server updates in a rolling manner, updating two storage servers simultaneously is recommended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
1 months ago
A) Failed storage server updates are automatically rolled back to a previous release.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think B and D are the correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
Updating two storage servers simultaneously? That's like trying to change two tires on a moving car. B is a big no-no.
upvoted 0 times
Leigha
11 days ago
When running a 'yum update' for a new Exadata release, make sure to disable all other repositories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
21 days ago
To speed up applying storage server updates, it's better to update them one at a time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
26 days ago
Failed storage server updates are automatically rolled back to a previous release, which is helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 months ago
Failed storage server updates are automatically rolled back to a previous release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
1 months ago
Updating two storage servers simultaneously is risky, it can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
2 months ago
Updating two storage servers simultaneously is not recommended, it can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shanice
2 months ago
I agree with you, Lauran. Failed updates should be rolled back automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I think A and E are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
Option A is correct, failed storage server updates are automatically rolled back. Definitely a good safety net to have.
upvoted 0 times
Isreal
1 months ago
Preventing kernel and RDMA package updates on storage cells seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 months ago
Updating two storage servers simultaneously can definitely speed up the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 months ago
I think it's also important to disable other repositories when updating to a new Exadata release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 months ago
Yes, that's right. It's good to know updates can be rolled back automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evan
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think B and D are the correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
3 months ago
I agree with you, Truman. Failed updates should be rolled back automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
3 months ago
I think A and E are true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77