Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-900 Topic 9 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-900 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 9
[All 1Z0-900 Questions]

When should a JPA entity implement the Serializable interface?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Melvin
1 months ago
Serializable? More like 'Serializawful'! Am I right, folks? *winks* But in all seriousness, I think option C is the way to go. Better safe than sorry when it comes to JPA entities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I thought JPA entities were always Serializable by default. Maybe I've been living under a rock or something. *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
Franchesca
4 days ago
I see, so it's necessary to implement the Serializable interface when JPA entities are used in the EJB Full container. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
19 days ago
No, it's not a trick question. JPA entities are not always Serializable by default. They should implement the Serializable interface when used outside of the EJB Lite container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 months ago
I think the Serializable interface should be implemented when JPA entities are used as parameters or return values by the remote EJB operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wava
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. If we're using JPA entities as parameters or return values for remote EJB operations, then we should definitely implement Serializable, right? Gotta keep that data transfer secure!
upvoted 0 times
Germaine
1 months ago
I agree. It's important to implement Serializable in such cases to maintain data integrity and security during remote communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
2 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Implementing Serializable ensures that the JPA entity can be serialized and transferred over the network for remote EJB operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I've used JPA entities without implementing Serializable before, and it seemed to work fine. Maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C might also be correct because JPA entities are always required to implement the Serializable interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
2 months ago
I agree with Alishia, D makes sense for using JPA entities as parameters or return values in remote EJB operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The Serializable interface is a requirement for JPA entities, so we should always implement it.
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
25 days ago
True, but option D specifically mentions remote EJB operations, which is important to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
1 months ago
Option B makes sense too, especially if the entities are used outside of the EJB Lite container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
I think it's actually option D, because remote EJB operations require serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alishia
3 months ago
I think the answer is D, because JPA entities need to be serializable for remote EJB operations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77