Serializable? More like 'Serializawful'! Am I right, folks? *winks* But in all seriousness, I think option C is the way to go. Better safe than sorry when it comes to JPA entities.
Wait, is this a trick question? I thought JPA entities were always Serializable by default. Maybe I've been living under a rock or something. *scratches head*
No, it's not a trick question. JPA entities are not always Serializable by default. They should implement the Serializable interface when used outside of the EJB Lite container.
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. If we're using JPA entities as parameters or return values for remote EJB operations, then we should definitely implement Serializable, right? Gotta keep that data transfer secure!
Yes, that's correct. Implementing Serializable ensures that the JPA entity can be serialized and transferred over the network for remote EJB operations.
I'm not so sure about that. I've used JPA entities without implementing Serializable before, and it seemed to work fine. Maybe option B is the right choice?
Melvin
1 months agoBreana
2 months agoFranchesca
4 days agoFranchesca
19 days agoFranchesca
1 months agoWava
2 months agoGermaine
1 months agoSalome
2 months agoCherry
2 months agoTequila
2 months agoArmando
2 months agoAshleigh
2 months agoVirgina
25 days agoNida
1 months agoTyisha
2 months agoThurman
2 months agoAlishia
3 months ago